Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509313›Full record

ReviewBMC research notes2018

Interpreting rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for Plasmodium falciparum.

Verner N Orish, Virtue F De-Gaulle, Adekunle O Sanyaolu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Microscopic and submicroscopic infection byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Verner N OrishDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Virtue F De-GaulleDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, P. O. Box LG 13, Legon, Ghana. nunana2009@live.com.
Adekunle O SanyaoluDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine of the University of Lagos, Idi-araba, Lagos, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRapid diagnostic tests have been of tremendous help in malaria control in endemic areas, helping in diagnosis and treatment of malaria cases. It is heavily relied upon in many endemic areas where microscopy cannot be obtained. However, caution should be taken in the interpretation of its result in clinical setting due to its limitations and inherent weakness. This paper seeks to present the varying malaria RDT test results, the possible interpretations and explanation of these results common in endemic regions. Published works on malaria RDT studies were identified using the following search terms "malaria RDT in endemic areas", "Plasmodium falciparum and bacterial coinfection" "Plasmodium falciparum RDT test results in children in endemic areas" in Google Scholar and PubMed.

resultsThe review results show that RDT positive results in febrile patients can either be true or false positive. True positive, representing either a possible single infection of Plasmodium or a co-infection of bacteria and P. falciparum. False RDT negative results can be seen in febrile patient with P. falciparum infection in prozone effect, Histidine rich protein 2 (HRP2) gene deletion and faulty RDT kits. Hence, a scale up of laboratory facilities especially expert microscopy and other diagnostic tools is imperative.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, ProtozoanChildDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFeverHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumL-Lactate DehydrogenaseProtozoan ProteinsMalaria diagnosisParasite lactose dehydrogenase enzyme (pLDH)Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich proteins-2 (HRP2)Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT)

Identifiers

PMID30509313
PMCPMC6278119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.