Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509275›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2018

Capturing fine-scale travel behaviors: a comparative analysis between personal activity location measurement system (PALMS) and travel diary.

Mingyu Kang, Anne V Moudon, Philip M Hurvitz, Brian E Saelens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingyu KangUrban Form Lab, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 535, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. mingyu@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-0135
Anne V MoudonUrban Form Lab, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 535, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Philip M HurvitzUrban Form Lab, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 535, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Brian E SaelensDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, 2001 Eighth Avenue, Suite 400, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.

Funding

The effect of light rail transit on physical activity: a natural experimentR01HL091881 · NHLBI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAELENS, BRIAN E · 2008 to 2012
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevice-collected data from GPS and accelerometers for identifying active travel behaviors have dramatically changed research methods in transportation planning and public health. Automated algorithms have helped researchers to process large datasets with likely fewer errors than found in other collection methods (e.g., self-report travel diary). In this study, we compared travel modes identified by a commonly used automated algorithm (PALMS) that integrates GPS and accelerometer data with those obtained from travel diary estimates.

methodsSixty participants, who made 2100 trips during seven consecutive days of data collection, were selected from among the baseline sample of a project examining the travel behavior impact of a new light rail system in the greater Seattle, WA (USA) area. GPS point level analyses were first conducted to compare trip/place and travel mode detection results using contingency tables. Trip level analyses were then performed to investigate the effect of proportions of time overlap between travel logs and device-collected data on agreement rates. Global performance (with all subjects' data combined) and subject-level performance of the algorithm were compared at the trip level.

resultsAt the GPS point level, the overall agreement rate of travel mode detection was 77.4% between PALMS and the travel diary. The agreement rate for vehicular trip detection (84.5%) was higher than for bicycling (53.5%) and walking (58.2%). At the trip level, the global performance and subject-level performance of the PALMS algorithm were 46.4% and 42.4%, respectively. Vehicular trip detection showed highest agreement rates in all analyses. Study participants' primary travel mode and car ownership were significantly related to the subject-level mode agreement rates.

conclusionsThe PALMS algorithm showed moderate identification power at the GPS point level. However, trip level analyses found lower agreement rates between PALMS and travel diary data, especially for active transportation. Testing different PALMS parameter settings may serve to improve the detection of active travel and help expand PALMS's applicability in geographically different urbanized areas with a variety of travel modes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSelf ReportTransportationAccelerometryBicyclingFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor VehiclesTravelWalkingWashingtonAccelerometerAutomated algorithmGISGPSPlacesTrips

Identifiers

PMID30509275
PMCPMC6278002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.