Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509274›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Area deprivation and attachment to a general practitioner through centralized waiting lists: a cross-sectional study in Quebec, Canada.

Mélanie Ann Smithman, Astrid Brousselle, Nassera Touati, Antoine Boivin, Kareen Nour, Carl-Ardy Dubois, Christine Loignon, Djamal Berbiche, Mylaine Breton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social and health determinants of wait times for primary care in Canada.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Toward a universal definition of provider-patient attachment in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mélanie Ann SmithmanCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay Lac-St-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Astrid BrousselleSchool of Public Administration, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Suite A302, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Nassera TouatiCentre de recherche sur la gouvernance, École nationale d'administration publique, 4750, Avenue Henri-Julien, Office 5117, Montreal, Quebec, H2T 3E5, Canada.
Antoine BoivinCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Kareen NourDirection de santé publique, Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux - Montérégie-Centre, 1255 rue Beauregard, Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 2M3, Canada.
Carl-Ardy DuboisFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, 2375, chemin de la Côte Ste-Catherine, Office 5103, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1A8, Canada.
Christine LoignonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay Lac-St-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Djamal BerbicheCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay Lac-St-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Mylaine BretonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay Lac-St-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, Quebec, J4K 0A8, Canada. mylaine.breton@USherbrooke.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to primary healthcare is an important social determinant of health and having a regular general practitioner (GP) has been shown to improve access. In Canada, socio-economically disadvantaged patients are more likely to be unattached (i.e. not have a regular GP). In the province of Quebec, where over 30% of the population is unattached, centralized waiting lists were implemented to help patients find a GP. Our objectives were to examine the association between social and material deprivation and 1) likelihood of attachment, and 2) wait time for attachment to a GP through centralized waiting lists.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in five local health networks in Quebec, Canada, using clinical administrative data of patients attached to a GP between June 2013 and May 2015 (n = 24, 958 patients) and patients remaining on the waiting list as of May 2015 (n = 49, 901), using clinical administrative data. Social and material area deprivation indexes were used as proxies for patients' socio-economic status. Multiple regressions were carried out to assess the association between deprivation indexes and 1) likelihood of attachment to a GP and 2) wait time for attachment. Analyses controlled for sex, age, local health network and variables related to health needs.

resultsPatients from materially medium, disadvantaged and very disadvantaged areas were underrepresented on the centralized waiting lists, while patients from socially disadvantaged and very disadvantaged areas were overrepresented. Patients from very materially advantaged and advantaged areas were less likely to be attached to a GP than patients from very disadvantaged areas. With the exception of patients from socially disadvantaged areas, all other categories of social deprivation were more likely to be attached to a GP compared to patients from very disadvantaged areas. We found a pro-rich gradient in wait time for attachment to a GP, with patients from more materially advantaged areas waiting less than those from disadvantaged areas.

conclusionOur findings suggest that there are socio-economic inequities in attachment to a GP through centralized waiting lists. Policy makers should take these findings into consideration to adjust centralized waiting list processes to avoid further exacerbation of health inequities.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuebecRegression AnalysisSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsCanadaCross-sectionalHealth services accessibilityHealthy equityPhysicians, familyPhysicians, primary carePrimary health careQuebecSocioeconomic factorsWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID30509274
PMCPMC6277998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.