Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509256›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2018

Cellular and acellular ex vivo lung perfusion preserve functional lung ultrastructure in a large animal model: a stereological study.

Jasmin Steinmeyer, Simon Becker, Murat Avsar, Jawad Salman, Klaus Höffler, Axel Haverich, Gregor Warnecke, Christian Mühlfeld, Matthias Ochs, Anke Schnapper-Isl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The pig as a model for immunology research.Cell and tissue research · 2020
    Review
  12. Reduced-flow ex vivo lung perfusion to rehabilitate lungs donated after circulatory death.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jasmin SteinmeyerInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Simon BeckerInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Murat AvsarDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jawad SalmanDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Klaus HöfflerDepartment of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Axel HaverichREBIRTH Cluster of Excellence, Hannover, Germany.
Gregor WarneckeREBIRTH Cluster of Excellence, Hannover, Germany.
Christian MühlfeldInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias OchsInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Anke Schnapper-IslInstitute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Schnapper.Anke@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-8875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEx vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is used by an increasing number of transplant centres. It is still controversial whether an acellular or cellular (erythrocyte enriched) perfusate is preferable. The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether acellular (aEVLP) or cellular EVLP (cEVLP) preserves functional lung ultrastructure better and to generate a hypothesis regarding possible underlying mechanisms.

methodsLungs of 20 pigs were assigned to 4 groups: control, ischaemia (24 h), aEVLP and cEVLP (both EVLP groups: 24 h ischaemia + 12 h EVLP). After experimental procedures, whole lungs were perfusion fixed, samples for light and electron microscopic stereology were taken, and ventilation, diffusion and perfusion related parameters were estimated.

resultsLung structure was well preserved in all groups. Lungs had less atelectasis and higher air content after EVLP. No significant group differences were found in alveolar septum composition or blood-air barrier thickness. Small amounts of intraalveolar oedema were detected in both EVLP groups but significantly more in aEVLP than in cEVLP.

conclusionsBoth EVLP protocols supported lungs well for up to 12 h and could largely prevent ischaemia ex vivo reperfusion associated lung injury. In both EVLP groups, oedema volume remained below the level of functional relevance. The group difference in oedema formation was possibly due to inferior septal perfusion in aEVLP.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsCitratesFemaleLungMalePerfusionPositive-Pressure RespirationRandom AllocationSwineTissue PreservationCitratesPerfadexEx vivo lung perfusionIschaemia ex vivo reperfusion associated lung injuryIschaemia-reperfusion injuryLung ultrastructureStereology

Identifiers

PMID30509256
PMCPMC6278069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.