Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509204›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2018

The Geriatric Emergency Department Intervention model of care: a pragmatic trial.

Marianne Wallis, Elizabeth Marsden, Andrea Taylor, Alison Craswell, Marc Broadbent, Adrian Barnett, Kim-Huong Nguyen, Colleen Johnston, Amanda Glenwright, Julia Crilly

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Failure to Re-identify and Manage Known Dementia Associated With Hospital Readmission and LOS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Team-based, Multidisciplinary Care in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marianne WallisSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia. mwallis@usc.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2753-1066
Elizabeth MarsdenSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Andrea TaylorSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Alison CraswellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Marc BroadbentSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Adrian BarnettInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation & School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Kim-Huong NguyenCenter for Health Service Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Colleen JohnstonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Amanda GlenwrightProgram Management Office, Central Queensland, Wide Bay, Sunshine Coast PHN, Ground Floor, Mayfield House, 29 The Esplanade, Maroochydore, QLD, 4558, Australia.
Julia CrillyMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith, QLD, 4222, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate a Geriatric Emergency Department Intervention (GEDI) model of service delivery for adults aged 70 years and older.

methodsA pragmatic trial of the GEDI model using a pre-post design. GEDI is a nurse-led, physician-championed, Emergency Department (ED) intervention; developed to improve the care of frail older adults in the ED. The nurses had gerontology experience and education and provided targeted geriatric assessment and streamlining of care. The final format included 2.4 full time equivalent nurses working 7 days from 0700 h to 1730 h (1530 h at weekends). There were three implementations periods: pre-implementation (2012); a developmental phase from January 2013 to August 2015; and full implementation from September 2015 to August 2016. The outcomes measured were disposition (discharged home, admitted or died); ED length of stay; hospital length of stay; all cause in-hospital mortality within 28 days; time to ED re-presentation up to 28 days post-discharge; in-hospital costs. The setting was a tertiary hospital ED, with 385 beds, in Queensland, Australia. Approximately 53,000 patients presented to the ED annually with 20% aged 70 years and older. All patients over the age 70 who presented to the ED between January 2012 and August 2016 (n = 44,983) were included in the trial.

resultsOlder persons who presented to the ED when the GEDI team were working had increased likelihoods of discharge (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.13-1.24) and reduced ED length of stay (HR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.33-1.52) compared with those who presented when GEDI were not working. There was no increase in the risk of mortality (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.23-4.43) or risk of same cause re-presentation to 28 days (HR = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.99-1.49). The GEDI service resulted in average cost savings per ED presentation of $35 [95% CI, $21, $49] and savings of $1469 [95% CI, $1105, $1834] per hospital admission.

conclusionsImplementation of a nurse-led physician-championed model of ED care, focused on frail older adults, reduced ED length of stay, hospital admission and if admitted, hospital length of stay and cost, without increasing mortality or same cause re-presentation. These increases were sustained over time and after the initial implementation team had changed roles.

trial registrationAustralian Clinical Trials Registration Number ACTRN12615001157561 - retrospectively registered on 29/10/2015. Data were retrieved via retrospective access to clinical information systems. First data access was on 1/7/2015.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFrail ElderlyHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMalePatient DischargeQueenslandRetrospective StudiesDelivery of health careEmergency medical servicesEvaluationGeriatricHomes for the agedHospitalNurses’ practice patternsOutcomesPragmatic paradigmProtocol

Identifiers

PMID30509204
PMCPMC6276263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.