ArticleHERD2019
Evaluating the Psychosocial Impact of Indoor Public Spaces in Complex Healthcare Settings.
Article in HERD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlations between the architectural plans of dementia units and residents' well-being.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5): an attractive therapeutic target for aging-related cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Occupant health in buildings: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the opinions of building professionals and implications on research.Building and environment · 2022Article
- Improvements to Healthspan Through Environmental Enrichment and Lifestyle Interventions: Where Are We Now?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis article describes an approach to a metrics-based evaluation of public space in hospitals using cross-disciplinary qualitative and quantitative analyses. The method,
backgroundHealthcare is transiting toward a value-based policy at all levels. Choosing the right set of qualitative and quantitative analyses to support value-based design solutions is not always an easy journey for healthcare design consultants. This article seeks to pull together the key analyses to evaluate the impact of the hospital indoor public space on the psychosocial well-being of the hospital users.
methodA step-by step guide to performing key analyses to evaluate the impact of hospital indoor public space environment on the users' psychosocial well-being is provided. A case study from the authors' research is utilized to illustrate the application of the method.
resultsInterpolating the results of all the analyses, the reader can identify where in the layout most of interactions among users occur, identify their typology and evaluate the contribution to the general psychosocial well-being, and know which group of users is more exposed to a specific typology of interaction.
conclusionsThe IPSM method can help design consultants to measure the impact of the built environment of hospital public space on its occupants' psychosocial well-being: factual knowledge about the users' behavioral response with respect to wayfinding and social interaction. The application of the method is not limited to healthcare settings only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.