ArticleMedicine2018
Follow-up outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who underwent dilatation and curettage with the Karakoca resector balloon: A 188-case series over 5 years.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Broncho Muco Cleaner Balloon Dilation Therapy in Chronic Bronchitis-Predominant COPD: A Prospective Interventional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bronchial rheoplasty for chronic bronchitis: real-world evidence of safety and performance.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Interventional pulmonology for chronic inflammatory airway diseases.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Modern Bronchoscopic Treatment Options for Patients with Chronic Bronchitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- New bronchoscopic treatment modalities for patients with chronic bronchitis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Epithelial Resurfacing: The Bronchial Skin Peel.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously reported satisfactory results with the Karakoca resector balloon in 10 patients with stage IV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who did not respond to medical treatment. In this article, we present the outcomes of the Karakoca resector balloon dilatation and curettage technique in a larger case series (n = 188).A total of 188 COPD patients [mean age (SD): 69.2 (8.0) years; 46 females] classified as stage III to IV by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease criteria underwent balloon desobstruction for segmental and subsegmental bronchi by therapeutic bronchoscopy. None of the patients could have achieved symptom relief even under high-dose inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, or oxygen and noninvasive mechanical ventilation therapy before the intervention. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured, and modified Borg dyspnea scale (MBS) scores were determined before and 1 week and 1 month after the intervention.All patients were active smokers and 80% had concomitant chronic diseases. After the intervention, there was a notable reduction in the oxygen need of the patients. Comparison of lung function tests 1 week after the procedure with results before the procedure showed significant improvements in FEV1, MBS, and SpO2 levels (P < 0.001 for each), and the improvements were maintained for the entire postprocedural month (P < 0.001 for each). Except for 4 males, all patients were free of symptoms.These results confirmed our early observations that balloon dilatation and curettage is a safe and successful technique for medical treatment-resistant COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.