Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30508902›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with glioblastomas.

Jin-Duo Ding, Kun Yao, Peng-Fei Wang, Chang-Xiang Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is the prognostic nutritional index a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin-Duo DingDepartment of Neurosurgery.
Kun YaoDepartment of Pathology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, China.
Peng-Fei WangDepartment of Neurosurgery.
Chang-Xiang YanDepartment of Neurosurgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been proven to be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with malignancies. However, data regarding the role of PNI in human glioblastomas (GBMs) is lacking. We, therefore, aimed to investigate the association between PNI and clinical parameters and survival in GBM patients.This retrospective analysis included 300 GBM patients who were surgically treated at our institute from 2008 to 2017. PNI was calculated as albumin (g/L) + 5×total lymphocyte count (10/L). SPSS 22.0, GraphPad Prism 5, and X tile were the primary tools used for data analysis, figuring drawing, and calculating optimal cutoffs, respectively.Mean albumin value, lymphocyte count, and PNI were 42.13 ± 4.43 g/L, 1.73 ± 0.71 × 10/L, and 50.80 ± 6.01, respectively. PNI was increased in patients aged ≤60 years and in men. Moreover, PNI ≥44 was associated with improved overall survival in younger patients and women. PNI was not associated with isocitric dehydrogenase (IDH)-1 mutations or predicted survival in GBM patients without such mutations. Univariate analysis showed that a high preoperative Karnofsky performance score, gross total resection, completed chemoradiotherapy, IDH-1 mutations, and higher PNI levels were associated with favorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed that only completed chemoradiotherapy and IDH-1 mutations were independent prognostic factors.Our results indicated that PNI is associated with age and sex in GBM patients but fails to provide independent prognostic values.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAge FactorsBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID30508902
PMCPMC6283194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.