Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30508704›Full record

ArticleCognition2019

Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Muhammad A J Qadri, F Gregory Ashby, J David Smith, Robert G Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Conceptual anchoring dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. How do we generalize?Neurons, behavior, data analysis, and theory · 2021
    Article
  9. Pigeons proficiently switch among four tasks without cost.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad A J QadriTufts University, Department of Psychology, USA. Electronic address: Muhammad.Qadri@tufts.edu.
F Gregory AshbyUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.
J David SmithGeorgia State University, Department of Psychology, USA.
Robert G CookTufts University, Department of Psychology, USA.

Funding

The Emergence of Self-Control: Comparative Beh. and Neurobiological AssessmentsP01HD060563 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POSNER, MICHAEL I · 2010 to 2014
$4.1M
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Category LearningR01MH063760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ASHBY, F. GREGORY, HELIE, SEBASTIEN · 2002 to 2018
$3.6M
Rule-Guided Behavior across Species:Steps toward Declarative CognitionR01HD093690 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERAN, MICHAEL J · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
Mechanisms of Avian Visual Perception, Cognition, and ActionR01EY022655 · NEI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI COOK, ROBERT G · 2012 to 2014
$554k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022655NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD060563NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorization is an essential cognitive process useful for transferring knowledge from previous experience to novel situations. The mechanisms by which trained categorization behavior extends to novel stimuli, especially in animals, are insufficiently understood. To understand how pigeons learn and transfer category membership, seven pigeons were trained to classify controlled, bi-dimensional stimuli in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Following either dimensional, rule-based (RB) or information integration (II) training, tests were conducted focusing on the "analogical" extension of the learned discrimination to novel regions of the stimulus space (Casale, Roeder, & Ashby, 2012). The pigeons' results mirrored those from human and non-human primates evaluated using the same analogical task structure, training and testing: the pigeons transferred their discriminative behavior to the new extended values following RB training, but not after II training. Further experiments evaluating rule-based models and association-based models suggested the pigeons use dimensions and associations to learn the task and mediate transfer to stimuli within the novel region of the parametric stimulus space.

Indexed as

AssociationAnimalsColumbidaeConcept FormationConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningMalePsychomotor PerformanceTransfer, PsychologyAnalogical transferCategorizationPigeonProcedural learning

Identifiers

PMID30508704
PMCPMC6322971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.