ArticleAcademic pediatrics2019
Acceptability and Use of Evidence-Based Practices for Firearm Storage in Pediatric Primary Care.
Article in Academic pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric healthcare worker perspectives on implementation of a secure firearm storage program: a qualitative study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Firearm safety counseling is common but inconsistent: A survey of pediatric clinicians in the Southeastern United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Pediatric Healthcare Worker Perspectives on Implementation of a Secure Firearm Storage Program: A Qualitative Study.Research square · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Life-Course Suicide Rates by State Firearm Policy Environment.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2025Review
- Firearm screening and secure storage counseling among home visiting providers: a cross-sectional study of SafeCareFrontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Age Trends And State Disparities In Firearm-Related Suicide In The US, 1999-2020.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2023Article
- Equitable implementation of S.A.F.E. Firearm: A multi-method pilot study.Preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Emerging research areas and contributions of NIH in violence research across the lifespan and throughout different settings.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of strategies to implement firearm safety promotion as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Attitudes and perceived barriers to firearm safety anticipatory guidance by pediatricians: a statewide perspective.Injury epidemiology · 2021Article
- A mixed methods evaluation of parents' perspectives on the acceptability of the S.A.F.E. Firearm program.The journal of applied research on children : informing policy for children at risk · 2021Article
- Perspectives from firearm stakeholders on firearm safety promotion in pediatric primary care as a suicide prevention strategy: a qualitative study.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2019Article
- State of the science: a scoping review of primary prevention of firearm injuries among children and adolescents.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2019Article
- Adapting Safety Check as a Universal Suicide Prevention Strategy in Pediatric Primary Care.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePromoting safe firearm storage in pediatric primary care is one way to address youth suicide by firearm. The study objective was to determine the perspectives of primary care physicians (PCPs) and leaders of primary care practices regarding the acceptability and use of screening, counseling, and firearm locks-all components of an adapted evidence-based intervention known as the Firearm Safety Check.
methodsIn 2016, an online survey was conducted in two large US health systems. PCPs (n = 204) and leaders (n = 57) from 83 clinics were invited to participate. Respondents included 71 clinics (86%), 103 PCPs (50%), and 40 leaders (70%). Main outcomes included acceptability (6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better acceptability) and use of the 3 intervention components (4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater use), as measured by an adapted validated instrument.
resultsAnalyses were conducted in 2017. PCP acceptability of screening (mean = 4.28; standard deviation [SD] = 1.12) and counseling (mean = 4.56; SD = 0.89) were high, but acceptability for firearm lock provision was more neutral (mean = 3.78; SD = 1.16). Most PCPs endorsed sometimes screening (85%) and counseling (80%). Few PCPs offered firearm locks to caregivers (15%). Leaders reported consistent information.
conclusionThe acceptability of screening for firearms and safe storage counseling was high; both components were used commonly but not routinely. The acceptability of providing firearm locks was neutral, and use was rarely endorsed. This study provides important insights about areas of focus for future implementation efforts from policy and research perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.