ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019
Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal organ dose calculator for maternal CT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Diagnostic CT organ dose estimation in whole-body PET/CT examinations-comparison of a patient-specific monte carlo approach and a computational phantom-based CT dosimetry tool.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Improved organ absorbed dose estimation in abdominal CT using DICOM header-based tube current modulation profiles: Validation with measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Impact of Co-doping EuLuminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence · 2025Article
- Digital phantom versus patient-specific radiation dosimetry in adult routine thorax CT examinations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Reconstruction of organ doses for patients undergoing computed tomography examinations in Canada 1992-2019.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2024Article
- Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in paediatric congenital heart disease patients with epicardial cardiac implantable electronic devices.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Image quality and radiation dose in spinal surgery: a comparison of three imaging systems in phantom.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Comparison of organ and effective dose estimations from different Monte Carlo simulation-based software methods in infant CT and comparison with direct phantom measurements.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Organ dose conversion coefficients in CT scans for Korean adult males and females.Nuclear engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Optimization of Image Quality and Organ Absorbed Dose for Pediatric Chest X-Ray Examination: In-House Developed Chest Phantom Study.Radiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Radiation dose from computed tomography scans for Korean pediatric and adult patients.Journal of radiation protection and research · 2021Article
- Conversion factors to derive organ doses for canine subjects undergoing CT examinations.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2021Article
- Reduced Chest Computed Tomography Scan Length for Patients Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Dose Reduction and Impact on Diagnostic Utility.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
- Clinical value of SMI Combined with Low-Dose CT Scanning in differential diagnosis of Thyroid Lesions and Tumor Staging.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate organ doses in routine and low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) protocols using an experimental methodology. To compare experimental results with results obtained by the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for CT (NCICT) organ dose calculator. To address the differences on organ dose measurements using tube current modulation (TCM) and fixed tube current protocols.
methodsAn experimental approach to evaluate organ doses in pediatric and adult anthropomorphic phantoms using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) was employed in this study. Several analyses were performed in order to establish the best way to achieve the main results in this investigation. The protocols used in this study were selected after an analysis of patient data collected from the Institute of Radiology of the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (InRad). The image quality was evaluated by a radiologist from this institution. Six chest adult protocols and four chest pediatric protocols were evaluated. Lung doses were evaluated for the adult phantom and lung and thyroid doses were evaluated for the pediatric phantom. The irradiations were performed using both a GE and a Philips CT scanner. Finally, organ doses measured with dosimeters were compared with Monte Carlo simulations performed with NCICT.
resultsAfter analyzing the data collected from all CT examinations performed during a period of 3 yr, the authors identified that adult and pediatric chest CT are among the most applied protocol in patients in that clinical institution, demonstrating the relevance on evaluating organ doses due to these examinations. With regards to the scan parameters adopted, the authors identified that using 80 kV instead of 120 kV for a pediatric chest routine CT, with TCM in both situations, can lead up to a 28.7% decrease on the absorbed dose. Moreover, in comparison to the standard adult protocol, which is performed with fixed mAs, TCM, and ultra low-dose protocols resulted in dose reductions of up to 35.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Finally, the percent differences found between experimental and Monte Carlo simulated organ doses were within a 20% interval.
conclusionsThe results obtained in this study measured the impact on the absorbed dose in routine chest CT by changing several scan parameters while the image quality could be potentially preserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.