Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30508201›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2018

The Composition of Midgut Bacteria in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) That Are Naturally Susceptible or Refractory to Dengue Viruses.

Heather Coatsworth, Paola A Caicedo, Thea Van Rossum, Clara B Ocampo, Carl Lowenberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather CoatsworthC2D2 Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Paola A CaicedoCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Thea Van RossumDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Clara B OcampoCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Carl LowenbergerC2D2 Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Simon Fraser University · CACentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition, abundance, and diversity of midgut bacteria in mosquitoes can influence pathogen transmission. We used 16S rRNA microbiome profiling to survey midgut microbial diversity in pooled samples of laboratory colonized dengue-refractory, Cali-MIB, and dengue-susceptible, Cali-S Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). The 16S rRNA sequences from the sugar-fed midguts of adult females clustered to 63 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), primarily from Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Flavobacteria, and Actinobacteria. An average of five ASVs dominated the midguts, and most ASVs were present in both Cali-MIB and Cali-S midguts. No differences in abundance were noted at any phylogenetic level (Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus) by analysis of composition of microbiome (w = 0). No community diversity metrics were significantly different between refractory and susceptible mosquitoes. These data suggest that phenotypic differences in the susceptibility to dengue virus between Cali-MIB and Cali-S are not likely due to major differences in midgut bacterial communities.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAedesAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal TractPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30508201
PMCPMC6276830
OpenAlexW2904962851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.