ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2019
Utility of Cement Augmentation via Percutaneous Fenestrated Pedicle Screws for Stabilization of Cancer-Related Spinal Instability.
Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of minimally invasive surgery within a multidisciplinary approach for patients with metastatic spine disease over a decade: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Factors associated with spinal fixation mechanical failure after tumor resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Surgery of the tumors of the spine.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Early experience with percutaneous photodynamic nails for sacral metastatic disease and insufficiency fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis of functionality and pain relief.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Can Preoperative Hounsfield Unit Measurement Help Predict Mechanical Failure in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the Management of Multiple Myeloma.Clinical hematology international · 2024Review
- Surgical Management of the Metastatic Spine Disease: A Review of the Literature and Proposed Algorithm.Global spine journal · 2023Review
- Cardiopulmonary Cement Embolism Following Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Complication Avoidance in Surgical Management of Vertebral Column Tumors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- CT-Based Image-Guided Navigation and the DaVinci Robot in Spine Oncology: Changing Surgical Paradigms.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021Article
- The importance of multidisciplinary care for spine metastases: initial tumor management.Neuro-oncology practice · 2020Review
- Biological Cell Investigation of Structured Nitinol Surfaces for the Functionalization of Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Strategies: Changing the Treatment of Spine Tumors.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Experimental validation of adaptive pedicle screws-a novel implant concept using shape memory alloys.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Vertebral body cemented stents combined with posterior stabilization in the surgical treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression of the thoracolumbar spine.Surgical neurology international · 2020Article
- Treatment, complications, and outcomes of metastatic disease of the spine: from Patchell to PROMIS.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Essential Concepts for the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease: What the Surgeon Should Know and Practice.Global spine journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer patients experience pathological fractures and the typical poor bone quality frequently complicates stabilization. Methods for overcoming screw failure include utilization of fenestrated screws that permit the injection of bone cement into the vertebral body to augment fixation.
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cement augmentation via fenestrated screws.
methodsA retrospective chart review of patients with neoplastic spinal instability who underwent percutaneous instrumented stabilization with cement augmentation using fenestrated pedicle screws. Patient demographic and treatment data and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated by chart review and radiographic evaluation. Prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PRO) were evaluated at short (2- <6 mo) and long term (6-12 mo).
resultsCement augmentation was performed in 216 fenestrated pedicle screws in 53 patients. Three patients required reoperation. One patient had an asymptomatic screw fracture at 6 mo postoperatively that did not require intervention. No cases of lucency around the pedicle screws, rod fractures, or cement extravasation into the spinal canal were observed. Eight cases of asymptomatic, radiographically-detected venous extravasation were found. Systemic complications included a pulmonary cement embolism, a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, and a postoperative mortality secondary to pulmonary failure from widespread metastatic pulmonary infiltration. Significant improvement in PRO measures was found in short- and long-term analysis.
conclusionCement augmentation of pedicle screws is an effective method to enhance the durability of spinal constructs in the cancer population. Risks include cement extravasation into draining blood vessels, but risk of clinically significant extravasation appears to be exceedingly low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.