Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30508168›Full record

ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2019

Utility of Cement Augmentation via Percutaneous Fenestrated Pedicle Screws for Stabilization of Cancer-Related Spinal Instability.

Ori Barzilai, Lily McLaughlin, Eric Lis, Anne S Reiner, Mark H Bilsky, Ilya Laufer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Surgery of the tumors of the spine.EFORT open reviews · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. CT-Based Image-Guided Navigation and the DaVinci Robot in Spine Oncology: Changing Surgical Paradigms.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ori BarzilaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lily McLaughlinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Eric LisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anne S ReinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mark H BilskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ilya LauferDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients experience pathological fractures and the typical poor bone quality frequently complicates stabilization. Methods for overcoming screw failure include utilization of fenestrated screws that permit the injection of bone cement into the vertebral body to augment fixation.

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cement augmentation via fenestrated screws.

methodsA retrospective chart review of patients with neoplastic spinal instability who underwent percutaneous instrumented stabilization with cement augmentation using fenestrated pedicle screws. Patient demographic and treatment data and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated by chart review and radiographic evaluation. Prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PRO) were evaluated at short (2- <6 mo) and long term (6-12 mo).

resultsCement augmentation was performed in 216 fenestrated pedicle screws in 53 patients. Three patients required reoperation. One patient had an asymptomatic screw fracture at 6 mo postoperatively that did not require intervention. No cases of lucency around the pedicle screws, rod fractures, or cement extravasation into the spinal canal were observed. Eight cases of asymptomatic, radiographically-detected venous extravasation were found. Systemic complications included a pulmonary cement embolism, a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, and a postoperative mortality secondary to pulmonary failure from widespread metastatic pulmonary infiltration. Significant improvement in PRO measures was found in short- and long-term analysis.

conclusionCement augmentation of pedicle screws is an effective method to enhance the durability of spinal constructs in the cancer population. Risks include cement extravasation into draining blood vessels, but risk of clinically significant extravasation appears to be exceedingly low.

Indexed as

Bone CementsPedicle ScrewsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKyphoplastyLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSpinal FusionBone CementsCancerFenestrated screwsInstabilityPMMA bone cementSpinal instabilitySpineStabilizationTumor

Identifiers

PMID30508168
PMCPMC7311793
OpenAlexW2902053707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.