ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2019
Validation of the person-centred coordinated care experience questionnaire (P3CEQ).
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-reported experiences and patient-reported experience measures in primary care, home care, and community settings. A scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a PROM to measure patient-centredness in chronic care consultations in primary care.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- The stroke transitional care intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: a multisite pragmatic randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2023Trial
- Spanish Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C): Enhancing Collaborative Care and Patient Involvement.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- International survey of people living with chronic conditions: development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in 18 countries.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Person-Centered Care Planning for People With Multiple Chronic Conditions: An Environmental Scan of Models and Approaches.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties and constructs of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in primary care: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Digital Monitoring of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users Through Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Electronic Patient-Reported Experience Measures: Multicenter Prospective Study on Feasibility, Safety, and Predictive Modeling of Digital Engagement.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Identifying patient and provider determinants of primary care experiences and outcomes for persons with chronic conditions: a multilevel analysis of a nation-wide survey in Norway.Family practice · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an enhanced PERCCI-S (PERCCI-S-Rev) for measuring person-centred home-based primary care.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Confidence to Self-Manage in Diabetes: An All-Wales Cross-Sectional Population Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Multisource Coherence Analysis of the First European Multicenter Cohort Study for Cancer Prevention in People Experiencing Homelessness: Data Quality Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- [Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Person-Centered Practice Inventory-Care for Spanish patients].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024Article
- International survey of people living with chronic conditions (PaRIS survey): effects of general practitioner non-participation on the representativeness of the Norwegian patient data.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Understanding of 'person-centred care' in an oncology ICU: Associative group analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Implementing Systematic Patient-Reported Measures for Chronic Conditions Through the Naveta Value-Based Telemedicine Initiative: Observational Retrospective Multicenter Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Observational
- The development and structural validity testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C).PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring patient experiences of healthcare is increasingly emphasized as a mechanism to measure, benchmark and drive quality improvement, clinical effectiveness and patient safety at both national and local NHS level. Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is the conjunction of two constructs; person-centred care and care coordination. It is a complex intervention requiring support for changes to organizational structure and the behaviour of professionals and patients. P3C can be defined as: 'care and support that is guided by and organized effectively around the needs and preferences of individuals'. Despite the vast array of PRMS available, remarkably few tools have been designed that efficiently probe the core domains of P3C. This paper presents the psychometric properties of a newly developed PREM to evaluate P3C from a patient perspective.
methodsA customized EMIS search was conducted at 72 GP practices across the South West (Somerset, Devon and Cornwall) to identify 100 patients with 1 or more LTCs, and are frequent users of primary healthcare services. Partial Credit Rasch Modelling was conducted to identify dimensionality and internal consistency. Ecological validity and sensitivity to change were assessed as part of intervention designed to improve P3C in adults with multiple long-term conditions; comparisons were drawn between the P3CEQ and qualitative data.
resultsResponse rate for the P3CEQ was 32.82%. A two-factor model was identified. Rasch analysis confirmed unidimensionality of each factor (using infit MSQ values between 0.5 and 1.5). High internal consistency was established for both factors; For the Person-centred scale Cronbach's Alpha = 0.829, Person separation = 0.756 and for the coordination scale Cronbach's alpha = 0.783, person separation = 0.672.
conclusionsThe P3CEQ is a valid and reliable measure of P3C. The P3C is considered to have strong face, construct and ecological validity, with demonstrable sensitivity to change in a primary healthcare intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.