Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30508078›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental entomology2019

Comparison of Pesticide Exposure in Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Implications for Risk Assessments.

Angela E Gradish, Jozef van der Steen, Cynthia D Scott-Dupree, Ana R Cabrera, G Christopher Cutler, Dave Goulson, Olaf Klein, David M Lehmann, Johannes Lückmann, Bridget O'Neill and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental entomology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sweet products, subtle residues: neonicotinoid contaminations in commercial honey from Thailand.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Environmental Implication of Herbicide Use.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Angela E GradishSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jozef van der SteenWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cynthia D Scott-DupreeSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Ana R CabreraBayer CropScience LP, Research Triangle Park, NC.
G Christopher CutlerFaculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dave GoulsonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Olaf KleinEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, Germany.
David M LehmannCardiopulmonary and Immunotoxicology Branch, Environmental Public Health Division, National Health, and Environmental Effects Laboratory (NHEERL), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Johannes LückmannRIFCON GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.
Bridget O'NeillCorteva Agrisciences, Indianapolis, IN.
Nigel E RaineSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Bibek SharmaGlobal Regulatory Sciences, FMC Corporation, Ewing, NJ.
Helen ThompsonSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
University of Guelph · CACorteva (United States) · USDalhousie University · CAEnvironmental Protection Agency · USEurofins (Germany) · DEFMC (United States) · USSyngenta (United Kingdom) · GBTriangle · USUniversity of Sussex · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, regulatory pesticide risk assessments have relied on the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate test species for estimating the risk of pesticide exposure to all bee species. However, honey bees and non-Apis bees may differ in their susceptibility and exposure to pesticides. In 2017, a workshop ('Pesticide Exposure Assessment Paradigm for Non-Apis Bees') was held to assess if honey bee risk assessment frameworks are reflective of non-Apis bee pesticide exposure. In this article, we summarize the workshop discussions on bumble bees (Bombus spp.). We review the life history and foraging behavior of bumble bees and honey bees and discuss how these traits may influence routes and levels of exposure for both taxa. Overall, the major pesticide exposure routes for bumble bees and honey bees are similar; however, bumble bees face additional exposure routes (direct exposure of foraging queens and exposure of larvae and adults to soil residues). Furthermore, bumble bees may receive comparatively higher pesticide doses via contact or oral exposure. We conclude that honey bee pesticide risk assessments may not always be protective of bumble bees, especially queens, in terms of exposure. Data needed to reliably quantify pesticide exposure for bumble bees (e.g., food consumption rates, soil residue levels) are lacking. Addressing these knowledge gaps will be crucial before bumble bee exposure can be incorporated into the pesticide risk assessment process. Because bumble bees exhibit appreciable interspecific variation in colony and behavioral characteristics, data relevant to pesticide exposure should be generated for multiple species.

Indexed as

BeesEnvironmental ExposurePesticidesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleLarvaRisk AssessmentPesticides

Identifiers

PMID30508078
PMCPMC8215506
OpenAlexW2904487068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.