ArticleJAMA internal medicine2019
Medical Overuse as a Physician Cognitive Error: Looking Under the Hood.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The paradox of convenience: how information overload in mHealth apps leads to medical service overuse.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- The occurrence, types, reasons, and mitigation strategies of defensive medicine among physicians: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- [The problem of medical overuse : Finding a definition and solutions].Der Internist · 2021Review
- The impact of global budget payment reform on systemic overuse in Maryland.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Determinants of Medical Practice Variation Among Primary Care Physicians: Protocol for a Three Phase Study.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Why Not? Persuading Clinicians to Reduce Overuse.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020Article
- Understanding Geographic Variation in Systemic Overuse Among the Privately Insured.Medical care · 2020Article
- When more could be industry-driven: the case of the extracorporeal treatment of sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30508015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.