Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30507969›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A qualitative exploration of menstruation-related restrictive practices in Fiji, Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea.

Yasmin Mohamed, Kelly Durrant, Chelsea Huggett, Jessica Davis, Alison Macintyre, Seta Menu, Joyce Namba Wilson, Mary Ramosaea, Michael Sami, Dani J Barrington and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. BMJ global health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Yasmin MohamedBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-8639
Kelly DurrantBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chelsea HuggettWaterAid, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica DavisBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alison MacintyreWaterAid, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Seta MenuPlan International, Buka, Autonomous Region of Bougainville, Papua New Guinea.
Joyce Namba WilsonSusu Mamas, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea.
Mary RamosaeaWaterAid, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9746-6509
Michael SamiInternational Planned Parenthood Federation, Sub-Regional Office for the Pacific, Suva, Fiji.
Dani J BarringtonSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1486-9247
Donna McSkimmingInternational Women's Development Agency, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa NatoliBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUMelbourne Water · AUInternational Women's Development Agency · AUPlan International · USUniversity of Goroka · PGUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of the South Pacific · FJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attitudes and beliefs about menstruation can place restrictions on menstruating women and girls, limiting their ability to fully participate in community life, education and employment. This paper presents evidence on menstruation-related beliefs contributing to restrictive practices in Papua New Guinea (PNG), Solomon Islands (SI) and Fiji. Focus group discussions and interviews were undertaken with 307 adolescent girls, women and men in a rural and urban site in each country. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Participants described a range of attitudes and beliefs that restrict the behaviour of menstruating women and girls. Themes include the belief that menstrual blood is 'dirty'; that when menstruating, girls and women can bring 'bad luck' to men; secrecy and shame associated with menstruation; and beliefs about the impact of certain behaviours on menstruation and health. Restrictive practices were more frequently reported in PNG and SI than Fiji, and more common in rural compared with urban sites. Some restrictions, such as avoidance of household chores, were perceived as desirable or driven by women themselves. However participants identified other restrictions, such as not being able to attend church or hygienically wash menstrual hygiene materials, as unwanted, in some cases impacting on participation in school, work and community life. Education initiatives guided by women and girls, implemented by local stakeholders and grounded in a sound understanding of specific contexts are needed to address discriminatory attitudes and beliefs that contribute to unwanted restrictions, and to support enabling attitudes and beliefs regarding menstruation.

Indexed as

MenstruationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFijiHumansHygieneMaleMelanesiaMiddle AgedPapua New GuineaRural PopulationSiblingsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30507969
PMCPMC6277107
OpenAlexW2902140738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.