ArticlePloS one2018
Construction of a highly saturated linkage map in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina L.) using GBS for SNP marker calling.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic dissection of apricot fruit skin color (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026Article
- Identification of phenological QTLs using a combination of high- and low-coverage whole genome sequencing in Japanese plum (Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Article
- Descriptive Genomic Analysis and Sequence Genotyping of the Two Papaya Species (Vasconcellea pubescens and Vasconcellea chilensis) Using GBS Tools.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- An Upgraded, Highly Saturated Linkage Map of Japanese Plum (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis ofGenetics research · 2022Article
- QTLs Identification for Iron Chlorosis in a Segregating Peach-Almond Progeny Through Double-Digest Sequence-Based Genotyping (SBG).Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Advances in genomics for diversity studies and trait improvement in temperate fruit and nut crops under changing climatic scenarios.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Chromosome-level draft genome of a diploid plum (Prunus salicina).GigaScience · 2020Article
- Classification of Takifugu rubripes, T. chinensis and T. pseudommus by genotyping-by-sequencing.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reports the construction of high density linkage maps of Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) using single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs), obtained with a GBS strategy. The mapping population (An x Au) was obtained by crossing cv. "Angeleno" (An) as maternal line and cv. "Aurora" (Au) as the pollen donor. A total of 49,826 SNPs were identified using the peach genome V2.1 as a reference. Then a stringent filtering was carried out, which revealed 1,441 high quality SNPs in 137 An x Au offspring, which were mapped in eight linkage groups. Finally, the consensus map was built using 732 SNPs which spanned 617 cM with an average of 0.96 cM between adjacent markers. The majority of the SNPs were distributed in the intragenic region in all the linkage groups. Considering all linkage groups together, 85.6% of the SNPs were located in intragenic regions and only 14.4% were located in intergenic regions. The genetic linkage analysis was able to co-localize two to three SNPs over 37 putative orthologous genes in eight linkage groups in the Japanese plum map. These results indicate a high level of synteny and collinearity between Japanese plum and peach genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.