Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30507285›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2019

Six months on: NHS England needs to focus on dissemination, implementation and audit of its low-priority initiative.

Alex J Walker, Seb Bacon, Helen Curtis, Richard Croker, Brian MacKenna, Ben Goldacre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Medicines identified as low priority for funding: a Welsh perspective.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. An era of caution and careful planning.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex J WalkerThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-6135
Seb BaconThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Helen CurtisThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Richard CrokerThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Brian MacKennaThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-9063
Ben GoldacreThe DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Heath Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

State MedicineDrug PrescriptionsEnglandHumansMedical AuditNeeds AssessmentPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30507285
PMCPMC6348558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.