Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30507228›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2018

Towards personalized, brain-based behavioral intervention for transdiagnostic anxiety: Transient neural responses to negative images predict outcomes following a targeted computer-based intervention.

Rebecca B Price, Logan Cummings, Danielle Gilchrist, Simona Graur, Layla Banihashemi, Susan S Kuo, Greg J Siegle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neural Connectivity Subtypes Predict Discrete Attentional Bias Profiles Among Heterogeneous Anxiety Patients.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca B PriceDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology.
Logan CummingsDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-3095
Danielle GilchristDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
Simona GraurDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
Layla BanihashemiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
Susan S KuoDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
Greg J SiegleDeparments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.

Funding

Neural Dimensions of Attention Bias Modification for Transdiagnostic AnxietyK23MH100259 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRICE, REBECCA · 2013 to 2017
$788k
National Institutes of HealthNIMH NIH HHS K23 MH100259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical anxiety is prevalent, highly comorbid with other conditions, and associated with significant medical morbidity, disability, and public health burden. Excessive attentional deployment toward threat is a transdiagnostic dimension of anxiety seen at both initial and sustained stages of threat processing. However, group-level observations of these phenomena mask considerable within-group heterogeneity that has been linked to treatment outcomes, suggesting that a transdiagnostic, individual differences approach may capture critical, clinically relevant information.

methodSeventy clinically anxious individuals were randomized to receive 8 sessions of attention bias modification (ABM; n = 41 included in analysis), a computer-based mechanistic intervention that specifically targets initial stages of threat processing, or a sham control (n = 21). Participants completed a mixed block/event-related functional MRI task optimized to discriminate transient from sustained neural responses to threat.

resultsLarger transient responses across a wide range of cognitive-affective regions (e.g., ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala) predicted better clinical outcomes following ABM, in both a priori anatomical regions and whole-brain analyses; sustained responses did not. A spatial pattern recognition algorithm using transient threat responses successfully discriminated the top quartile of ABM responders with 68% accuracy.

conclusionsNeural alterations occurring on the relatively transient timescale that is specifically targeted by ABM predict favorable clinical outcomes. Results inform how to expand on the initial promise of neurocognitive treatments like ABM by fine-tuning their clinical indications (e.g., through personalized mechanistic intervention relevant across diagnoses) and by increasing the range of mechanisms that can be targeted (e.g., through synergistic treatment combinations and/or novel neurocognitive training protocols designed to tackle identified predictors of nonresponse). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersAttentionBehavior TherapyBrainFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePredictive Value of TestsTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30507228
PMCPMC6287282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.