Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30507071›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2019

Targeted metagenomics approach to capture the biodiversity of Saccharomyces genus in wild environments.

Haya F Alsammar, Samina Naseeb, Lorenzo B Brancia, R Tucker Gilman, Ping Wang, Daniela Delneri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cutting edge tools in the field of soil microbiology.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BeyondFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Unique Brewing-Relevant Properties of a Strain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. HimalayanApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haya F AlsammarManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Samina NaseebManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Lorenzo B BranciaSt Ambrose College, Altrincham, WA15 0HE, UK.
R Tucker GilmanSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Ping WangGenomic Core Facility, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Daniela DelneriManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8070-411X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L021471/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The species of the genus Saccharomyces are commonly inhabiting tree bark and the surrounding soil, but their abundance have likely been underestimated due to biases in culturing methods. Metagenomic studies have so far been unable to detect Saccharomyces species in wild environments. Here, we sequenced the mycobiome of soils surrounding different trees at various altitudes in the Italian Alps. To survey for yeasts species belonging to Saccharomyces genus rather than other fungal species, we performed a selectivity step involving the isolation of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region that is specific to this yeast group. Reads mapping to Saccharomyces species were detected in all soil samples, including reads for S. mikatae and for S. eubayanus. ITS1 alignment of the S. cerevisiae, S. paradoxus and S. kudriavzevii sequences showed up to three base pair polymorphisms with other known strains, indicating possible new lineages. Basidiomycetous fungi were still the dominant species, compared to the Ascomycota, but the selectivity step allowed for the first time the detection and study of the biodiversity of the Saccharomyces species in their natural environment.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerGenome, FungalItalyMetagenomicsSaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNATreesDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID30507071
PMCPMC6767435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.