Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506959›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Measuring intra-axonal T

Emilie T McKinnon, Jens H Jensen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-modal Monte Carlo MRI simulator of tissue microstructure.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Relaxation-Diffusion Spectrum Imaging for Probing Tissue Microarchitecture.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  14. The impact of head orientation with respect to BImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilie T McKinnonCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jens H JensenCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MEDICAL SCIENTISTST32GM008716 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DEMORE, NANCY · 1999 to 2024
$9.3M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Otolaryngology and Communication SciencesT32DC014435 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC014435NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008716NIH HHS T32DC014435NIH HHS T32GM008716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo demonstrate how the T

methodsFor b-values larger than about 4000 s/mm

resultsThe estimated T

conclusionThe relaxation time for intra-axonal water in white matter can be determined in a straightforward manner by measuring the direction-averaged diffusion MRI signal with a large b-value for multiple TEs. In healthy brain, T

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAxonsBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic FieldsReproducibility of ResultsWaterWhite MatterWaterbraindiffusion MRIdirection-averagedintra-axonalT2white matter

Identifiers

PMID30506959
PMCPMC6686904
OpenAlexW2903471028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.