Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506924›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2019

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate the weight gain drug, mirtazapine transdermal ointment, in cats with unintended weight loss.

Melinda Poole, Jessica M Quimby, Tianhua Hu, Daizie Labelle, William Buhles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 2022 ISFM/AAFP Cat Friendly Veterinary Environment Guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of Effects of Capromorelin and Mirtazapine on Appetite in New Zealand White Rabbits (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ACVIM consensus statement on pancreatitis in cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda PooleKindred Biosciences, Inc., Burlingame, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-1639
Jessica M QuimbyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tianhua HuKindred Biosciences, Inc., Burlingame, California.
Daizie LabelleKindred Biosciences, Inc., Burlingame, California.
William BuhlesKindred Biosciences, Inc., Burlingame, California.
Collaborative Drug Discovery (United States) · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Kindred Biosciences, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mirtazapine is classified as a weight gain drug in cats, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in cats experiencing unintended weight loss. This was a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study in client-owned cats ≥1 year of age, weighing ≥2 kg, with a documented loss (≥5%) in body weight. Cats were treated once daily with either 2 mg/cat mirtazapine transdermal ointment (n = 83) or placebo (n = 94) (Per Protocol population) applied to the inner surface of the pinna for 14 ± 3 days. Physical examination, body weight, complete blood count, serum chemistry, and urinalysis were performed prior to treatment and on Day 14. Changes in body weight between the mirtazapine and placebo groups were evaluated from Day 1 to Day 14 and compared using a two-sample t test. The mean percent change in body weight was +3.9% (standard deviation ±5.4%) in the mirtazapine group and +0.4% (±3.3%) in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). The most common adverse event was mild erythema at the application site in 17.4% of placebo and 10.4% of mirtazapine-treated cats. Application of mirtazapine transdermal ointment was well tolerated both topically and systemically and resulted in significant weight gain in cats experiencing unintended weight loss associated with various underlying diseases.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsAppetite StimulantsCat DiseasesCatsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleMaleMirtazapineOintmentsRandom AllocationWeight GainWeight LossAppetite StimulantsMirtazapineOintmentsappetitedysrexiamirtazapinetransdermalweight gain

Identifiers

PMID30506924
PMCPMC7379659
OpenAlexW2902936193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.