Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506913›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2019

What do you expect? Catastrophizing mediates associations between expectancies and pain-facilitatory processes.

Junie S Carriere, Marc Olivier Martel, Samantha M Meints, Marise C Cornelius, Robert R Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Temporal Summation in Fibromyalgia Patients: Comparing Phasic and Tonic Paradigms.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Junie S CarriereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Marc Olivier MartelFaculties of Dentistry and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Samantha M MeintsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Marise C CorneliusDepartment of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USChestnut Hill College · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

Training in Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Clinical ResearchT32AR055885 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KATZ, JEFFREY NEIL, LOSINA, ELENA · 2008 to 2023
$4.0M
Biobehavioral Risk Factors for Persistent Pain following Total Knee ArthroplastyR01AG034982 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI EDWARDS, ROBERT R · 2010 to 2014
$3.2M
Opioid-induced change in pain sensitivity and modulation: Links to opioid misuseR21DA041020 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI EDWARDS, ROBERT R · 2016 to 2017
$488k
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR055885NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034982NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA041020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain expectancies are associated with altered pain sensitivity in individuals with chronic pain. However, little is known about the processes by which pain expectancies impact pain processing. This study assessed the association between pain expectancies and temporal summation (TS) of pain, and examined whether pain catastrophizing mediated this association.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, participants (437 chronic low back pain [CLBP] patients, 115 controls) completed self-report measures of pain intensity, pain expectancies and pain catastrophizing before undergoing psychophysical pain-testing procedures designed to assess mechanical TS of mechanical pain. Pearson's correlations examined the associations between study variables in CLBP patients and controls. Bootstrapping mediation analyses assessed the mediating role of pain catastrophizing on the association between pain expectancies and TS of pain.

resultsTemporal summation of pain was significantly associated with pain expectancies (r = 0.113) and pain catastrophizing (r = 0.171) in CLBP patients. Results of mediation analyses revealed that pain catastrophizing mediated the relationship between pain expectancies and TS of pain in CLBP patients (ab = 0.309, 95% CI = 0.1222-0.5604), but not in healthy controls (ab = -0.125, 95% CI = -0.5864 to 0.0244).

conclusionsThe findings from this study suggest that compared to controls, CLBP patients show increased sensitivity to mechanical pain procedures and enhanced pain-facilitatory processing, proving further evidence for changes in central nervous system pain processing in CLBP patients. Our results also suggest that pain catastrophizing may be the mechanism by which pain expectancies are associated with TS of pain in CLBP patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with chronic low back pain who expect higher levels of pain and catastrophize about their pain are more likely to experience altered pain sensitivity. Our results point to catastrophizing as a mechanism of action through which psychological factors may operate and lead to the development and maintenance of chronic low back pain.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCatastrophizationChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPostsynaptic Potential Summation

Identifiers

PMID30506913
PMCPMC6420376
OpenAlexW2902540736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.