Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506711›Full record

Observational studyJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2019

Prediction of Prolonged ICU Stay in Cardiac Surgery Patients as a Useful Method to Identify Nutrition Risk in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Observational Study.

Christian Stoppe, Julia Ney, Vladimir V Lomivorotov, Sergey M Efremov, Carina Benstoem, Aileen Hill, Ekaterina Nesterova, Elena Laaf, Andreas Goetzenich, Bernard McDonald and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian StoppeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-2039
Julia NeyDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Vladimir V LomivorotovDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Centre, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Sergey M EfremovDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Centre, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Carina BenstoemDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Aileen HillDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ekaterina NesterovaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, National Pirogov Medical Centre, Moscow, Russia.
Elena LaafDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Andreas GoetzenichDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Bernard McDonaldDivision of Cardiac Anesthesia & Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Arne PeineDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Gernot MarxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and 3CARE, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Karl FehnleAlgora: Statistics and Clinical Research, Haar, Germany.
Daren K HeylandClinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular surgery patients with a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay may benefit most from early nutrition support. Using established scoring systems for nutrition assessment and operative risk stratification, we aimed to develop a model to predict a prolonged ICU stay ≥5 days in order to identify patients who will benefit from early nutrition interventions.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospective observational study of patients undergoing elective valvular, coronary artery bypass grafting, or combined cardiac surgery. The nutrition risk was assessed by well-established screening tools. Patients' preoperative EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), primary disease, and intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time were included as independent variables in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict a prolonged ICU stay (>4 days).

resultsThe number of cardiac surgery patients included was 1193. Multivariate analysis revealed that for prediction of ICU stay >4 days, both Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.716, P = .020) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score (AUC: 0.715, P = .037) were significant, whereas for prediction of ICU stay >5 days, only the MNA score showed significant results (AUC: 0.762, P = .011).

conclusionPresent data provide first evidence about the combined use of EuroSCORE, primary disease, CPB time, and nutrition risk screening tools for prediction of prolonged ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients. If prospectively evaluated in adequately designed studies, this model may help to identify patients with prolonged ICU stay to initiate early postoperative nutrition therapy and thus, facilitate an enhanced recovery.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayModels, BiologicalNutritional StatusNutritional SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCoronary Artery BypassFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Agedcardiac diseasecardiac surgeryICU staynutritionnutrition assessmentnutrition screening toolsnutrition support practiceoutcomes qualityoutcomes researchparenteral nutritionprediction modelresearch and diseases

Identifiers

PMID30506711
PMCPMC7379574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.