ArticleThe Journal of physiology2019
Seven consecutive days of remote ischaemic preconditioning improves cutaneous vasodilatory capacity in young adults.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of ischemic conditioning on microvascular reactivity to single passive limb movement in young adults: a pilot study.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Trial
- Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning on Endurance Running Performance in the Heat.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2024Trial
- Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy.BioMed research international · 2023Trial
- Common and Divergent Physiological Responses to Hypoxia and Heat.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Hypoxia Conditioning for Load-Compromised Athletes: A Narrative Review Exploring Potential Applications in Injury and Disability Management.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Promoting Resiliency to Stress in the Vascular Endothelium.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Review
- A Single Bout of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Suppresses Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Asian Obese Young Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Remote ischaemic preconditioning - translating cardiovascular benefits to humans.The Journal of physiology · 2022Review
- Delayed Cutaneous Microvascular Responses With Non-consecutive 3 Days of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- The Impact of Serial Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation and Brain Injury Related Biomarkers.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Does remote ischaemic conditioning reduce inflammation? A focus on innate immunity and cytokine response.Basic research in cardiology · 2021Review
- Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs.Biology of sex differences · 2020Article
- Regular transient limb ischemia protects endothelial function against hypercholesterolemic damage in rabbits.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key pointsRemote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC), induced by brief bouts of ischaemia followed by reperfusion, confers vascular adaptations that protect against subsequent bouts of ischaemia; however, the effect of RIPC repeated over several days on the human microcirculation is unknown. Using skin as a model, microvascular function was assessed at a control and a NO-inhibited area of skin before 1 day after and 1 week after administering seven consecutive days of repeated RIPC on the contralateral arm. Maximal vasodilatation was increased by ∼20-50% following 7 days of repeated RIPC, and this response remained elevated 1 week after stopping RIPC; however, NO-mediated vasodilatation was not affected by the RIPC stimulus. These data indicate that repeated RIPC augments maximal vasodilatation, but the underlying mechanism for this improvement is largely independent of NO. This finding suggests a role for other endothelium-derived mediators and/or for endothelium-independent adaptations with repeated RIPC. ABSTRACT: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC), induced by intermittent periods of ischaemia followed by reperfusion, confers cardiovascular protection from subsequent ischaemic bouts. RIPC increases conduit and resistance vessel function; however, the effect of RIPC on the microvasculature remains unclear. Using human skin as a microvascular model, we hypothesized that cutaneous vasodilatory (VD) function elicited by localized heating would be increased following repeated RIPC. Ten participants (23 ± 1 years, 6 males, 4 females) performed RIPC for seven consecutive days. Each daily RIPC session consisted of 4 repetitions of 5 min of arm blood flow occlusion interspersed by 5 min reperfusion. Before, 1 day after and 1 week after the 7 days of RIPC, two microdialysis fibres were placed in ventral forearm skin for continuous infusion of Ringer solution or 20 mM l-NAME. Red blood cell flux was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry at each fibre site during local heating (T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.