Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506674›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

Imputation of race/ethnicity to enable measurement of HEDIS performance by race/ethnicity.

Ann Haas, Marc N Elliott, Jacob W Dembosky, John L Adams, Shondelle M Wilson-Frederick, Joshua S Mallett, Sarah Gaillot, Samuel C Haffer, Amelia M Haviland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ann HaasRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Marc N ElliottRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7147-5535
Jacob W DemboskyRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John L AdamsKaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness and Safety Research, Pasadena, California.
Shondelle M Wilson-FrederickOffice of Minority Health, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joshua S MallettRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Sarah GaillotCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Samuel C HafferU.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, District of Columbia.
Amelia M HavilandRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1068-4031
RAND Corporation · USCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · USKaiser Permanente · USOffice of Minority Health · USUnited States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · US

Funding

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services GS-10F-0275P/HHSM-500-2014-00399G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve an existing method, Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (MBISG) 1.0 that augments the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) administrative measure of race/ethnicity with surname and geographic data to estimate race/ethnicity. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingData from 284 627 respondents to the 2014 Medicare CAHPS survey. STUDY

designWe compared performance (cross-validated Pearson correlation of estimates and self-reported race/ethnicity) for several alternative models predicting self-reported race/ethnicity in cross-sectional observational data to assess accuracy of estimates, resulting in MBISG 2.0. MBISG 2.0 adds to MBISG 1.0 first name, demographic, and coverage predictors of race/ethnicity and uses a more flexible data aggregation framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe linked survey-reported race/ethnicity to CMS administrative and US census data. PRINCIPAL

findingsMBISG 2.0 removed 25-39 percent of the remaining MBISG 1.0 error for Hispanics, Whites, and Asian/Pacific Islanders (API), and 9 percent for Blacks, resulting in correlations of 0.88 to 0.95 with self-reported race/ethnicity for these groups.

conclusionsMBISG 2.0 represents a substantial improvement over MBISG 1.0 and the use of CMS administrative data on race/ethnicity alone. MBISG 2.0 is used in CMS' public reporting of Medicare Advantage contract HEDIS measures stratified by race/ethnicity for Hispanics, Whites, API, and Blacks.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicareUnited Statesbiostatistical methodsHEDISMedicarequality of care/patient safety (measurement)racial/ethnic differences in health and health care

Identifiers

PMID30506674
PMCPMC6338295
OpenAlexW2902201369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.