Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506666›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Quality of End-of-Life Care and Its Association with Nurse Practice Environments in U.S. Hospitals.

Karen B Lasater, Douglas M Sloane, Matthew D McHugh, Linda H Aiken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frequency of anticancer drug use at the end of life: a scoping review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of End of Life Care in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals.The Journal of nursing administration · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen B LasaterCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Douglas M SloaneCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew D McHughCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Linda H AikenCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to describe the quality of end-of-life care in US hospitals from the perspective of hospital nurses; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between the nurse practice environment and end-of-life care quality.

designCross-sectional analysis of multiple linked secondary data sources. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingA total of 12,870 direct care registered nurses in 491 acute-care hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Measures of end-of-life care quality and nurse practice environment were derived from the 2016 RN4CAST-US survey of nurses. Nurses reported on end-of-life care quality for patients for whom death within a year would not be surprising. Nurse practice environment was measured using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a National Quality Forum validated scale.

resultsMost nurses gave their hospitals an unfavorable evaluation of end-of-life care overall (58%) and said patients often experience painful procedures that were unlikely to change their outcome (53%). The best predictor of poor quality was the nurse practice environment. Nurses in the best environments were 55% less likely than nurses in poor environments to rate their hospital's overall end-of-life care quality unfavorably (odds ratio = 0.45; 95% confidence interval = 0.39-0.52; P < .001).

conclusionQuality of end-of-life care in US hospitals is imperfect and is significantly worse in hospitals with poor nurse practice environments than in hospitals with the best environments. This study reinforces the importance of nurses in providing high-quality end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:302-308, 2019.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalPractice Patterns, Nurses'Quality of Health CareTerminal CareUnited StatesWorkplaceend of lifehospitalsquality

Identifiers

PMID30506666
PMCPMC6367037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.