Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506526›Full record

SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019

Cell-free DNA and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Anders Kindberg Boysen, Jakob Vasehus Schou, Karen-Lise Garm Spindler

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anders Kindberg BoysenDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. andboy@rm.dk.
Jakob Vasehus SchouDepartment of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Karen-Lise Garm SpindlerDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, yet valid circulating biomarkers are lacking. We aimed at systematically reviewing the literature of cell-free DNA and locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed. We retrieved papers reporting a correlation between a clinical outcome and cell-free DNA for patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

resultsWe included nine studies of a total of 615 patients. Only single-arm studies were identified, analyzing either the total level of cell-free DNA or tumor-specific DNA. Despite differences in the methodology and outcomes, eight of the nine studies showed a correlation between cell-free DNA and a clinical outcome.

conclusionsCell-free DNA might hold prognostic and predictive information for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy; although, firm conclusions are limited by the heterogeneity in this field.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHumansPreoperative CarePrognosisRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCell-free DNAChemoradiotherapyRectal cancerSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.