Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506498›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2019

The prognostic significance of TERT promoter mutations in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Victor M Lu, Anshit Goyal, Adrian Lee, Mark Jentoft, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Kaisorn L Chaichana

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pathology and Molecular Biology of Melanoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Brain Invasion and Trends in Molecular Research on Meningioma.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor M LuPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. z5134616@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-5890
Anshit GoyalMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Adrian LeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark JentoftDepartment of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Kaisorn L ChaichanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. Chaichana.Kaisorn@mayo.edu.
Jacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (TERTp) region have been associated with worse prognosis in some cancers. Meningiomas are the most common type of primary central nervous tumors, and evaluation of the prognostic significance of TERTp mutations across the literature is lacking. The aim of this study was to pool all current evidence to assess for clinical relevance of TERTp mutations in meningioma and survival effect.

methodsSearches of seven electronic databases from inception to September 2018 were conducted following the appropriate guidelines. Two hundred and twenty seven articles were identified for screening. Hazard ratio (HR) and mean difference (MD) statistics were obtained and pooled utilizing both fixed- and random-effect (RE) models. Meta-regression was utilized to determine potential sources of heterogeneity and statistical influence.

resultsA total of five retrospective observational cohort studies describing 532 meningioma patients satisfied selection criteria. The incidence of TERTp mutations was 8%, and was associated with significantly worse prognosis (HR 3.79; P = 0.005) and significantly shorter overall survival (MD 59.8 months; P = 0.037) by RE modelling. Meningioma grade was not significantly associated with a TERTp mutation effect, however, preliminary meta-regression trends indicated this may be significant once greater statistical power is achieved.

conclusionThe current evidence indicates the presence of a TERTp mutation in meningioma can be associated with worse prognosis, and shorter overall survival. Routine detection in greater numbers will allow for further validation, as well as delineate the effect across histological grades. By identifying this subgroup of meningioma patients early in management, it may support more frequent follow-up and aggressive management to optimize survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticHumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaPrognosisSurvival RateTelomeraseTelomeraseTERT protein, humanMeningiomaMutationPromoterTelomerase reverse transcriptaseTERT

Identifiers

PMID30506498
OpenAlexW2902294348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.