ArticleClinical rheumatology2019
Evaluation of cytokine profiles in rheumatoid arthritis patients with clinically active disease and normal inflammatory indices.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the potential utility of a cytokine measurement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with active joint disease but normal acute phase reactants (APR).
methodsRA patients in a longitudinal observational registry with available cytokine array data were included. Patients were categorized based on agreement/disagreement of physical examination and APR measurements: concordant high (CH) [high tender and/or swollen joint counts (TJC + SJC > 3) and APR (ESR ≥ 28 mm/h + CRP ≥ 1.5 mg/L)]; concordant low (CL) [TJC + SJC ≤ 3 and normal APR]. Discordant (D) [TJC + SJC > 3 and normal APR] patients were stratified into low, medium, and high-disease activity (DL, DM, DH). Weighted-average and log-transformed cytokine scores were calculated based on results of a cytokine array. Chi-square tests compared categorical variables by concordance status; t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, ANOVA models, and ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were used to compare continuous measures.
resultsRA patients (n = 1467) were predominantly male (91%). Compared to CH patients (n = 174), D (n = 434) were younger, less frequently seropositive, with lower TJC, SJC, and DAS28-3v scores (p < 0.001). Cytokine scores for DL, DM, and DH groups were lower than CH patients (p < 0.001) and did not differ between DL, DM, and DH subgroups and were similar to CL (n = 356) patients. In multivariable analyses including CH and D patients, log-cytokine score was associated with higher DAS28-3v scores (p = 0.029). In multivariable analyses including CL patients, concordance status (p = 0.011) and ACPA (p = 0.013) were predictors of higher log cytokine score.
conclusionIn this study, cytokine scores did not identify active joint disease in RA patients with normal APR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.