ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2019
One-year follow-up study of iBTA-induced allogenic biosheet for repair of abdominal wall defects in a beagle model: a pilot study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatocyte growth factor in biosheets promotes autonomous regeneration of cutaneous tissue after transplantation onto a full-thickness skin defect.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Development of a skeletal muscle sheet with direct reprogramming-induced myoblasts on a nanogel-cross-linked porous freeze-dried gel scaffold in a mouse gastroschisis model.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Application of Biosheets as Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Repair Materials in a Rat Model.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Urinary bladder reconstruction using autologous collagenous connective tissue membrane "Biosheet®" induced by in-body tissue architecture: A pilot study.Regenerative therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the usefulness of biosheet, an in-body tissue-engineered collagenous membrane, as a novel repair material for abdominal wall defects in a beagle model.
methodsBiosheets were prepared by embedding molds into subcutaneous pouches in two beagle dogs for 2 months, with subsequent storage in 70% ethanol. The obtained biosheets (thickness 0.5 mm, size 25 cm
resultsThe biosheets were not stressed during suturing and did not split; moreover, patch implantation into the defective wound was easy. No complications such as anastomotic leaks or infections occurred during implantation. One year post-implantation, the thickness of the biosheet implantation section increased to approximately 2.5 mm, corresponding to approximately 70% of the native abdominal wall. A section of the abdominal wall muscle elongated from the periphery of the newly formed collagen layer, and the peritoneum was entirely formed on the peritoneal cavity surface, resulting in partial regeneration of the three-layered abdominal wall. The mechanical strength of the newly formed wall was approximately fivefold higher than the native wall. The elasticity of the biosheet in the low-strain region decreased to approximately 10% post-implantation, similar to the native wall.
conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that biosheet maintained the abdominal wall without any complications for 1 year post-implantation, and partial regeneration was observed. Although this experiment was limited to two cases, the results indicated that biosheet may serve as a reliable abdominal wall restorative material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.