Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506171›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019

Limits to the appropriateness of intensive care : Policy statement of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI).

G Neitzke, H Burchardi, G Duttge, C Hartog, R Erchinger, P Gretenkort, A Michalsen, M Mohr, F Nauck, F Salomon and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Intensive care and emergency medicine overuse and sustainability].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. End-of-life practices in 11 German intensive care units : Results from the ETHICUS-2 study.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

G NeitzkeInstitute for Medical History, Ethics and Philosophy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
H Burchardi, Bovenden, Germany.
G DuttgeInstitute for Criminal Sciences-Department for Criminal Medical- and Biolaw, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
C HartogDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Operative Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
R Erchinger, Schopp, Germany.
P GretenkortSimulation and Emergency Academy Helios Clinic Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany.
A MichalsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, Tettnang Clinic Campus Bodensee, Tettnang, Germany.
M MohrDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DIAKO Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
F NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
F Salomon, Lemgo, Germany.
H Stopfkuchen, Mainz, Germany.
N WeilerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, University Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
U JanssensMedical Clinic and Medical Intensive Care Medicine, St.-Antonius Hospital, Dechant-Decker-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Germany. uwe.janssens@sah-eschweiler.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Critical CareEmergency MedicineMedical OveruseGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID30506171
PMCPMC6344395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.