Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30506115›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

A Robust and Efficient ECC-based Mutual Authentication and Session Key Generation Scheme for Healthcare Applications.

Arezou Ostad-Sharif, Dariush Abbasinezhad-Mood, Morteza Nikooghadam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arezou Ostad-SharifDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.
Dariush Abbasinezhad-MoodDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.
Morteza NikooghadamDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran. m.nikooghadam@imamreza.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-3103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telecare medicine information system (TMIS) has provided an efficient and convenient way for communications of patients at home and medical staffs at clinical centers. To make these communications secure, user authentication by medical servers is considered as a crucial requirement. For this purpose, many user authentication and key agreement protocols have been put forwrad in order to fulfil this vital necessity. Recently, Arshad and Rasoolzadegan have revealed that not only the authentication and key agreement protocols suggested by Amin and Biswas and Giri et al. are defenseless against the replay attack and do not support the perfect forward secrecy, but also Amin and Biswas's protocol is susceptible to the offline password guessing attack. Nonetheless, in this paper, we demonstrate that Arshad and Rasoolzadegan's and the other existing schemes still fail to resist a well-known attack. Therefore, to cover this security gap, a new user authentication and session key agreement protocol is recommended that can be employed effectively for offering secure communication channels in TMIS. Our comparative security and performance analyses reveal that the proposed scheme can both solve the existing security drawback and, same as Arshad and Rasoolzadegan's scheme, has low communication and computational overheads.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityInformation SystemsTelemedicineAlgorithmsWireless TechnologyAnonymityAuthenticationKey agreementSecurityTMIS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.