ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
A Robust and Efficient ECC-based Mutual Authentication and Session Key Generation Scheme for Healthcare Applications.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel authentication protocol to ensure confidentiality among the Internet of Medical Things in covid-19 and future pandemic scenario.Internet of things (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- A Smart Card-Based Two-Factor Mutual Authentication Scheme for Efficient Deployment of an IoT-Based Telecare Medical Information System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- LACP-SG: Lightweight Authentication Protocol for Smart Grids.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Blockchain Enabled Anonymous Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for Internet of Health Things.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dependable and Provable Secure Two-Factor Mutual Authentication Scheme Using ECC for IoT-Based Telecare Medical Information System.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Secure Three-Factor Authentication Protocol for Multi-Gateway IoT Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telecare medicine information system (TMIS) has provided an efficient and convenient way for communications of patients at home and medical staffs at clinical centers. To make these communications secure, user authentication by medical servers is considered as a crucial requirement. For this purpose, many user authentication and key agreement protocols have been put forwrad in order to fulfil this vital necessity. Recently, Arshad and Rasoolzadegan have revealed that not only the authentication and key agreement protocols suggested by Amin and Biswas and Giri et al. are defenseless against the replay attack and do not support the perfect forward secrecy, but also Amin and Biswas's protocol is susceptible to the offline password guessing attack. Nonetheless, in this paper, we demonstrate that Arshad and Rasoolzadegan's and the other existing schemes still fail to resist a well-known attack. Therefore, to cover this security gap, a new user authentication and session key agreement protocol is recommended that can be employed effectively for offering secure communication channels in TMIS. Our comparative security and performance analyses reveal that the proposed scheme can both solve the existing security drawback and, same as Arshad and Rasoolzadegan's scheme, has low communication and computational overheads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30506115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.