ArticleNanoImpact2018
An inventory of ready-to-use and publicly available tools for the safety assessment of nanomaterials.
Article in NanoImpact, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- NanoDefiner Framework and e-Tool Revisited According to the European Commission's Nanomaterial Definition 2022/C 229/01.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of a Quasi-Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model for Prediction of the Immobilization Response of Daphnia magna Exposed to Metal-Based Nanomaterials.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2022Article
- Composition, thickness, and homogeneity of the coating of core-shell nanoparticles-possibilities, limits, and challenges of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Nanosafety: An Evolving Concept to Bring the Safest Possible Nanomaterials to Society and Environment.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Safe- and sustainable-by-design: The case of Smart Nanomaterials. A perspective based on a European workshop.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2022Article
- Insights into Nanopesticides for Ticks: The Superbugs of Livestock.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Features, applications, and sustainability of lipid nanoparticles in cosmeceuticals.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Review
- Safe-by-Design in Engineering: An Overview and Comparative Analysis of Engineering Disciplines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Reliable Surface Analysis Data of Nanomaterials in Support of Risk Assessment Based on Minimum Information Requirements.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Towards safe and sustainable innovation in nanotechnology: State-of-play for smart nanomaterials.NanoImpact · 2021Review
- Best practices from nano-risk analysis relevant for other emerging technologies.Nature nanotechnology · 2019Article
- NanoDefiner e-Tool: An Implemented Decision Support Framework for Nanomaterial Identification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Developing OECD test guidelines for regulatory testing of nanomaterials to ensure mutual acceptance of test data.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2019Article
- Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legislation addressing environmental, health and safety aspects of nanomaterials in consumer products and ensuring their safe use is being continuously updated in the European Union and globally. This leads to a growing need for tools to implement this developing legislation. A freely accessible inventory of ready-to-use and publicly available tools that together cover the tasks within a nanomaterial safety assessment process was built in the presented work. This inventory is a unique metadata set in Excel® format: the 'NANoREG Toolbox', which assembles information needed for selecting and accessing instruments that meet specific goals. The recorded tools are categorised according to their purpose, type and regulatory status. The Toolbox covers an unprecedented and broad range of over 500 current tools, developed in Europe and beyond. While NANoREG focussed on safety assessment under the EU Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the instruments in the Toolbox are relevant and useful for nanomaterial safety assessments worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.