Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505969›Full record

ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2018

Cholangioscopy in the digital era.

Fares Ayoub, Dennis Yang, Peter V Draganov

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Peroral cholangioscopy: Update on the state-of-the-art.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  7. Choledochoscopy: An update.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cholangioscopy and its Role in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.European medical journal. Hepatology · 2020
    Article
  13. The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Current Status and Future Perspective in Cholangiopancreatoscopy.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fares AyoubDepartment of Medicine, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Dennis YangDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter V DraganovDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangioscopy allows direct visualization and subsequent therapeutic maneuvers of the biliary ductal system. With advances in endoscopic and imaging technology, cholangioscopy has become an important modality for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures and an essential therapeutic tool for difficult to remove biliary stones. Enhanced imaging and operability of the latest generation cholangioscopes have further expanded their clinical applications to include ductal tumor ablation, gallbladder drainage, access to difficult to reach branches of the biliary tree, and biliary foreign body manipulation. In this review, we discuss the technical evolution of cholangioscopy into the digital era and review the clinical evidence supporting its use in the diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract disease.

Indexed as

electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL)laser lithotripsy (LL)Per-oral cholangioscopy (POC)single-operator cholangioscopySpyGlass

Identifiers

PMID30505969
PMCPMC6232065
OpenAlexW2898736713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.