Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505932›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection.

Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Yousuke Nakai, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Saito, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Rie Uchino, Naminatsu Takahara and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05716633 (Tracking the ENcapsulation of Pancreatic Collections in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis. A Serial MRI Based Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05716633 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Tracking the ENcapsulation of Pancreatic Collections in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis. A Serial MRI Based Prospective Study (MRI-ENCAP Study)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Necrotizing PancreatitisArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of early pancreatic necrotic collection: Single-center retrospective study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Observational
  8. Endoscopic drainage in necrotizing pancreatitis: Is the four-week cut-off still relevant?Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Endoscopic step up: When and how.Surgery open science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tanyaporn ChantarojanasiriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Natsuyo YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toshiba General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomotaka SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryunosuke HakutaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunaga IshigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Rie UchinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naminatsu TakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Suguru MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KogureDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Saburo MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru TadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30505932
PMCPMC6251787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.