Association model data learned from clinicians stratified by patient mortality outcomes at a Tertiary Academic Center.

Jason K Wang, Jason Hom, Santhosh Balasubramanian, Jonathan H Chen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason K WangMathematical and Computational Science Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Jason HomDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Santhosh BalasubramanianDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Jonathan H ChenDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1RR025744 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011

$22.4M

Data-Mining Clinical Decision Support from Electronic Health RecordsK01ES026837 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JONATHAN H. · 2015 to 2019

$893k

NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025744NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026837

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this data article, we learn clinical order patterns from inpatient electronic health record (EHR) data at a tertiary academic center from three different cohorts of providers: (1) Clinicians with lower-than-expected patient mortality rates, (2) clinicians with higher-than-expected patient mortality rates, and (3) an unfiltered population of clinicians. We extract and make public these order patterns learned from each clinician cohort associated with six common admission diagnoses (e.g. pneumonia, chest pain, etc.). We also share a reusable reference standard or benchmark for evaluating automatically-learned clinical order patterns for each admission diagnosis, based on a manual review of clinical practice literature. The data shared in this article can support further study, evaluation, and translation of data-driven CDS systems. Further interpretation and discussion of this data can be found in Wang et al. (2018).

Identifiers

PMID30505898

DOI10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.163

PMCPMC6247447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.