ArticleData in brief2018
Evaluation data about accuracy of cadmium-zinc-telluride imaging in detecting single and multivessel coronary artery disease: Focus on gender differences.
Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Men are from Mars and women are from Venus: The nuclear cardiology point of view.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Changes in left ventricle myocardial volume during stress test using cadmium-zinc-telluride cardiac imaging: Implications in coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The data presented in this article are related to the research article entitled: "Accuracy of cadmium-zinc-telluride imaging in detecting single and multivessel coronary artery disease: is there any gender difference?" (Gimelli et al., 2018). We evaluated gender-related differences in diagnostic accuracy of cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in detecting single- and multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We included 1161 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (228, 25% women and 873, 75% men) who had been referred to our laboratory for stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (single-day stress-rest low-dose ultrafast protocol). All patients underwent coronary angiography within 30 days; CAD was defined in the presence of a coronary stenosis >70%. Summed stress scores (SSS), summed rest scores (SRS) and summed difference scores (SDS) were obtained. Image quality was graded "good" or better in more than 90% of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.