ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2018
No-touch vein grafts and the destiny of venous revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of no-touch versus conventional technique on arteriovenous fistula outcomes: a randomised controlled trial.Journal of nephrology · 2024Trial
- Influence of Three Different Surgical Techniques on Microscopic Damage of Saphenous Vein Grafts-A Randomized Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-Centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019Trial
- The SWEDEGRAFT Saphenous Vein Trial: A Study of No-Touch vs. Nordic Grafts?Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Keeping NO in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Great Saphenous Vein Lumen: Intimal Openings.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- [Multiple arterial grafts does not increase perioperative or short- to medium-term risks of postoperative MACE in patients with impaired left ventricular function: 3-year follow-up results].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Saphenous vein graft and nitric oxide: strategies to prevent graft failure and enhance patency in coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention in no-touch vein grafts are significantly better than in conventional vein grafts.Perfusion · 2025Article
- Superior long-term patency of no-touch vein graft compared to conventional vein grafts in over 1500 consecutive patients.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Early Experiences of Serbian Surgeons Using No-Touch Technique for Vein Conduits in CABG Patients: A Follow-Up Study with Multi-Slice CT Angiography.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
- Effect of preservation solution and distension pressure on saphenous vein's endothelium.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Saphenous veins in coronary artery bypass grafting need external support.Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2021Review
- What is the impact of preserving the endothelium on saphenous vein graft performance? Comments on the 'NO' touch harvesting technique.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Preserving the endothelium in saphenous vein graft with both conventional and no-touch preparation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Article
- No-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is currently the leading cause of death globally, with coronary artery bypass grafting among the most common operations performed worldwide. More extensive use of arterial grafts has been advocated because of their high long-term patency, long-term survival benefit, and freedom from reinterventions. Despite this, the saphenous vein is the most frequently used conduit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery since its introduction over 50 years ago. Consequently, the saphenous vein remains an indispensable conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting and maintaining its long-term patency is one of the most crucial challenges in cardiovascular surgery. This situation led to the development of the no-touch saphenous vein harvesting technique, where the vein is harvested completely with its pedicle of surrounding tissue. Several studies report a superior long-term patency rate, slower progression of atherosclerosis, and better clinical outcomes whilst employing no-touch harvesting technique. The success of the technique is multifactorial, including the decreased risk for graft spasm-and the need for manual distension-preservation of the vaso vasorum and an intact endothelium, reducing neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the intact perivascular tissue, including the surrounding cushion of fat, may act as a "natural external stent", providing mechanical support preventing the graft from kinking. We are convinced that the use of arterial grafts, in combination with the no-touch saphenous vein graft, will significantly improve the results of coronary artery bypass grafting. This is important for achieving a comprehensive and evidence-based balance between the major treatment strategies of ischemic heart disease, explicitly coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. The no-touch technique is becoming increasingly popular among surgeons, with further studies to be initiated worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.