ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2018
Tumor mutational burden assessment as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in lung cancer patients: getting ready for prime-time or not?
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Rational application of the first-line chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer immunotherapy: prognostic marker today, predictive tool tomorrow?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Global research trends on biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- [Molecular pathology in non-small-cell lung cancer: current and emerging biomarkers].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Widespread Adoption of Precision Anticancer Therapies After Implementation of Pathologist-Directed Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Across a Large US Health System.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Clinical impact for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients tested using comprehensive genomic profiling at a large USA health care system.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Article
- Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Review
- Predicting colorectal cancer prognosis based on long noncoding RNAs of disulfidptosis genes.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Anoikis-related CTNND1 is associated with immuno-suppressive tumor microenvironment and predicts unfavorable immunotherapeutic outcome in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Prognostic model based on disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs for predicting survival and therapeutic response in bladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomic analysis for determining the response to anti-programmed death-1 therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: A pilot study.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of tislelizumab when combined with etoposide and carboplatin in patients with SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated thoracic tumor: a case report.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Liquid biopsy on the horizon in immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: current status, challenges, and perspectives.Cell death & disease · 2023Review
- Article
- Research progress of biomarkers in the prediction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapeutic efficiency in lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Challenges associated with the integration of immuno-oncology agents in clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Automated next-generation profiling of genomic alterations in human cancers.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of immunotherapy as a first- or second-line of treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic management of lung cancer patients. However, not all lung cancer patients receive the same benefit from this treatment, leading to limitations in the number of patients who can receive anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors because some secondary toxicity has been associated with immunotherapy, and because some patients would benefit more from chemotherapy. In this context, the selection of patients is currently based on PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), specifically on the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells. To date, this is the only validated biomarker that is used as a companion diagnostic test for immunotherapy in non-small cell carcinoma lung (NSCLC) patients. However, this biomarker is not sufficiently robust and demonstrates many challenges. For example, some patients with more than 50% PD-L1 positive tumor cells are non-responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, while conversely, other patients with no PD-L1 positive tumor cells are good responders. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) or tumor mutation load (TML) emerged recently as a new predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in NSCLC. However, this biomarker needs to be validated for routine clinical use and shares similar constraints with the PD-L1 IHC biomarker. PD-L1 IHC and TMB are currently the two best predictive biomarkers that could soon be used to systematically inform treatment decisions in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients. The aim of this review is to consider the possible integration of TMB testing in daily practice through a pros- and cons-debate, and to establish sample quality-dependent algorithms and the main current constraints for laboratories considering TMB assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.