ArticleBioResearch open access2018
Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.
Article in BioResearch open access, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04605406 (Daily Step Count and Achieving Goal Gestational Weight Gain), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Daily Step Count and Achieving Goal Gestational Weight Gain
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining prenatal physical activity and exercise as potential therapeutic strategy in promoting maternal health.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Prenatal physical activity and the gut microbiota of pregnant women: results from a preliminary investigation.Physical activity and nutrition · 2023Article
- Level of Physical Activity in Pregnant Populations from Different Geographic Regions: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Impact of physical activity on course and outcome of pregnancy from pre- to postnatal.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Review
- Sleep Duration during Pregnancy using an Activity Tracking Device.AJP reports · 2020Article
- Daily Relations between Social Perceptions and Physical Activity among College Women.Psychology of sport and exercise · 2020Article
- A feasibility study of activity tracking devices in pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Activity tracking devices in pregnancy: Understanding the participant experience in a longitudinal birth cohort.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4-77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076-15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145-475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8-16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.