ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2018
Esophagectomy from then to now.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physical function in patients with resectable cancer of the pancreas and liver-a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Pooled it
- Review
- ChestJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Role of Prehabilitation in Modern Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Giant hiatus hernia presenting as a chronic cough masking a sinister diagnosis.BMJ case reports · 2020Article
- Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection.BMC surgery · 2020Article
- Prognostic risk factors for respiratory failure after esophagectomy.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes dissection in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Comparison of the therapeutic effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection and minimally invasive esophagectomy for T1 stage esophageal carcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2019Article
- Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatalJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- The procedure of single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy and laparoscopic surgery for radical esophagectomy.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have come a long way from the onset of surgery for esophageal cancer. Surgical resection is pivotal for the long-term survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Moreover, advancements in post-operative care and surgical techniques have contributed to reductions in morbidity. More recently minimally invasive esophagectomy has been increasingly used in patients undergoing esophageal cancer resection. Potential advantages of MIE include: the decreased pulmonary complications, lower post-operative wound infection, decreased post-operative pain, and decreased length of hospitalization. The application of robotics to esophageal surgery is becoming more widespread. Robotic esophageal surgery has potential advantages over the known limitations of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches to esophagectomy while adhering to the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. This paper is a review of the evolution from open esophagectomy to the most recent robotic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.