Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505556›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018

Uniportal

Dania Nachira, Mahmoud Ismail, Elisa Meacci, Edoardo Zanfrini, Amedeo Iaffaldano, Marc Swierzy, Julianna Englisch, Svea Faber, Ramin Raul Ossami Saidy, Maria Letizia Vita and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. UniportJournal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Minimally invasive approach to pneumothorax: Single port or two ports?Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dania NachiraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Mahmoud IsmailCompetence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elisa MeacciDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Edoardo ZanfriniDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Amedeo IaffaldanoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Marc SwierzyCompetence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julianna EnglischCompetence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Svea FaberDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Ramin Raul Ossami SaidyDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Maria Letizia VitaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Venanzio PorziellaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Jens C RueckertCompetence Center of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefano MargaritoraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of triportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely recognized for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the potential advantages of uniportal VATS (U-VATS) for the treatment of PSP compared with triportal VATS.

methodsA total of 104 triportal (n=39) and uniportal (n=65) VATS procedures where performed for the treatment of PSP in two University hospitals. The prospectively collected data of postoperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the two VATS approaches.

resultsNo major adverse events occurred after operation. Compared with triportal-VATS, Uniportal-VATS showed the same effectiveness in terms of risk of recurrence (null in both groups), post-operative complications (P=1.000) and operating time (66.04±16.92

conclusionsU-VATS is feasible and safe and may be a less invasive alternative to triportal VATS for the treatment of PSP because of its effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain, paresthesia, hospital stay and in improving cosmetic results.

Indexed as

pleurectomyPneumothoraxtriportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (triportal VATS)uniportal VATS (U-VATS)

Identifiers

PMID30505556
PMCPMC6258640
OpenAlexW2803869306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.