ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic early learning curve for major lung resections in a high volume training center.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Board certification status and surgical outcomes after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary resection: a nationwide multicenter analysis.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Learning curve and outcomes of young surgeons in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy using bent-tip thoracoscopic forceps for lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The training in thoracoscopic surgery: a comparative study and bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Learning curve of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an analysis of the proficiency of 538 cases from a single centre.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- The learning curve of thoracoscopic surgery in a single surgeon and successful implementation of uniportal approach.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Powered articulation by the SigniaSurgery today · 2021Article
- Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: a consensus report from Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS).Translational lung cancer research · 2020Review
- Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for major lung resections is a novel upcoming approach, with increasing popularity worldwide. However, there is little literature regarding this technique's learning curve. We present our experience of the early learning curve of the uniportal VATS major lung resections in a high volume training centre, whilst analysing the advantages.
methodsSixty selected consecutive patients underwent uniportal VATS major lung resections, for early stage disease of NSCLC and benign disease during the learning curve of a single surgeon in a high volume training centre from July to October 2015. The perioperative variables and outcomes were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
resultsThe 60 patients undergoing a uniportal VATS approach included 47 lobectomies and 13 segmental resections, among which 56 cases of lung cancer and 4 of benign pulmonary disease were noted. Right upper lobectomy (RUL) was the most common procedure (42%). The mean operation time was 192.3±45.4 minutes, average blood loss was 167.9±94.4 mL. For patients with lung cancer, the total amount of lymph node stations sampled or dissected were 4.2±0.8. Chest drain duration was 2.9±0.9 days and length of hospital stay (LOS) was 4.38±1 days. Prolonged air leak (PAL) was the most common complication in 8.3% of the cases. PAL was the cause of prolonged hospital stay. One case was converted to thoracotomy for major bleeding. There were no deaths 30 days after surgery or readmissions. All cases had a R0 complete cancer resection on histology.
conclusionsThe uniportal VATS lobectomy and segmentectomy early learning curve in a high volume training centre is a safe venture, allowing surgeons to reach an expert level faster and perform more complex resections with a shorter training time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.