Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505351›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2018

A survey of foot orthoses prescription habits amongst podiatrists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.

Lara S Chapman, Anthony C Redmond, Karl B Landorf, Keith Rome, Anne-Maree Keenan, Robin Waxman, Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch, Heidi J Siddle, Michael R Backhouse

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lara S Chapman1Department of Podiatry, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4207-2809
Anthony C Redmond2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Karl B Landorf4Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Keith Rome6Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute and School of Podiatry, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anne-Maree Keenan3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Robin Waxman2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Heidi J Siddle2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael R Backhouse8York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
University of Leeds · GBAuckland University of Technology · NZLa Trobe University · AUUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDA/03/07/047Department of Health PDF-2013-06-055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoot orthoses are frequently used but little is known about which types are used in contemporary practice. This study aimed to explore the types of foot orthoses currently used by podiatrists and the prescription variations in a range of conditions.

methodsA web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed through professional bodies in the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, and New Zealand. Questions focussed on foot orthosis prescription habits in relation to 26 conditions affecting the back and lower limb.

resultsTwo hundred and sixty-four podiatrists practising in 19 different countries completed the survey; the majority practised in the UK (47%,

conclusionsFoot orthosis prescription habits vary between countries. Prefabricated orthoses were frequently prescribed in the UK and New Zealand, and customised orthoses in Australia. Prescriptions for people with diabetes differed depending on the presence of neuropathy, despite a lack of robust evidence supporting these decisions. This study provides new insight into contemporary practice.

Indexed as

AustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleFoot OrthosesHabitsHumansMaleNew ZealandPodiatryPrescriptionsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomFootOrthosesPodiatrySurvey

Identifiers

PMID30505351
PMCPMC6258496
OpenAlexW2902339806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.