Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505340›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018

Outcomes of selective nonoperative management of civilian abdominal gunshot wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aziza N Al Rawahi, Fatma A Al Hinai, Jamie M Boyd, Christopher J Doig, Chad G Ball, George C Velmahos, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Pradeep H Navsaria, Derek J Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Penetrating abdominal trauma in the era of selective conservatism: a prospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aziza N Al Rawahi *1Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Fatma A Al Hinai1Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Jamie M Boyd2Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Christopher J Doig2Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Chad G Ball1Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
George C Velmahos4Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
Andrew W Kirkpatrick1Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Pradeep H Navsaria5Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town, South Africa.
Derek J Roberts *Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Room A280, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-6291
University of Calgary · CAMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although mandatory laparotomy has been standard of care for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs) for decades, this approach is associated with non-therapeutic operations, morbidity, and long hospital stays. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to summarize outcomes of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of civilian abdominal GSWs. Methods: We searched electronic databases (March 1966-April 1, 2017) and reference lists of articles included in the systematic review for studies reporting outcomes of SNOM of civilian abdominal GSWs. We meta-analyzed the associated risks of SNOM-related failure (defined as laparotomy during hospital admission), mortality, and morbidity across included studies using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by calculating Results: Of 7155 citations identified, we included 41 studies [ Conclusions: SNOM of abdominal GSWs is safe when conducted in hemodynamically stable patients without a reduced level of consciousness or signs of peritonitis. Failure of SNOM may be lower in patients with GSWs to the back, flank, or right thoracoabdomen and be decreased by mandatory use of abdominopelvic CT scans.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesHumansInjury Severity ScorePatient SelectionPeritonitisRadiographyRisk AssessmentTrauma CentersTreatment OutcomeWounds, GunshotAbdominal gunshot woundsPenetrating traumaSelective nonoperative managementWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID30505340
PMCPMC6260713
OpenAlexW2903365913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.