Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505279›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Functionalized Anatomical Models for Computational Life Sciences.

Esra Neufeld, Bryn Lloyd, Beatrice Schneider, Wolfgang Kainz, Niels Kuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Progress in Understanding Radiofrequency Heating and Burn Injuries for Safer MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. A computational roadmap to electronic drugs.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PredictingFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esra NeufeldIT'IS Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bryn LloydIT'IS Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beatrice SchneiderÄrzteteam 51, Arbeitsmedizin Brugg, Brugg, Switzerland.
Wolfgang KainzDivision of Biomedical Physics, OSEL, CDRH, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Niels KusterIT'IS Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Open Platform for Online Simulations for Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions – o2S2PARCOT3OD025348 · OD · IT'IS FOUNDATION · PI KUSTER, NIELS · 2017 to 2024
$18.8M
NIH HHS OT3 OD025348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of detailed computational anatomical models has opened new avenues for computational life sciences (CLS). To date, static models representing the anatomical environment have been used in many applications but are insufficient when the dynamics of the body prevents separation of anatomical geometrical variability from physics and physiology. Obvious examples include the assessment of thermal risks in magnetic resonance imaging and planning for radiofrequency and acoustic cancer treatment, where posture and physiology-related changes in shape (e.g., breathing) or tissue behavior (e.g., thermoregulation) affect the impact. Advanced functionalized anatomical models can overcome these limitations and dramatically broaden the applicability of CLS in basic research, the development of novel devices/therapies, and the assessment of their safety and efficacy. Various forms of functionalization are discussed in this paper: (i) shape parametrization (e.g., heartbeat, population variability), (ii) physical property distributions (e.g., image-based inhomogeneity), (iii) physiological dynamics (e.g., tissue and organ behavior), and (iv) integration of simulation/measurement data (e.g., exposure conditions, "validation evidence" supporting model tuning and validation). Although current model functionalization may only represent a small part of the physiology, it already facilitates the next level of realism by (i) driving consistency among anatomy and different functionalization layers and highlighting dependencies, (ii) enabling third-party use of validated functionalization layers as established simulation tools, and (iii) therefore facilitating their application as building blocks in network or multi-scale computational models. Integration in functionalized anatomical models thus leverages and potentiates the value of sub-models and simulation/measurement data toward ever-increasing simulation realism. In our o

Indexed as

anatomical modelcomputational life sciencescomputational phantomfunctionalizationmodelingsimulation

Identifiers

PMID30505279
PMCPMC6250781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.