Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505259›Full record

ArticleWater science & technology, water supply2018

Evaluation of an environmentally sustainable UV-assisted water treatment system for the removal of

R G Silva, J Szabo, V Namboodiri, E R Krishnan, J Rodriguez, A Zeigler

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science & technology, water supply, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R G SilvaAPTIM, Test and Evaluation Facility, 1600 Gest Street, Cincinnati, OH 45204, USA.
J SzaboUS EPA, National Homeland Security Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
V NamboodiriUS EPA, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
E R KrishnanAPTIM, Test and Evaluation Facility, 1600 Gest Street, Cincinnati, OH 45204, USA.
J RodriguezAqua Treatment Service, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.
A ZeiglerWaterline Technology, Mansfield, OH, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USMansfield University · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of greener water treatment technologies is important for the production of safe drinking water and water security applications, such as decontamination. Chlorine assisted disinfection is common and economical, but can generate disinfection byproducts (DBPs) that may be of health concern. DBPs are formed due to the reaction of chlorine with naturally occurring organic and inorganic substances in water. Currently, various innovative technologies are being developed as alternative approaches for preventing DBPs during water treatment. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a novel combination of high efficiency flow filtration and UV disinfection treatment system for the removal of

Indexed as

B. globigiidisinfectionfiltrationgreen technologymembraneUV

Identifiers

PMID30505259
PMCPMC6260950
OpenAlexW2746229333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.