ArticleProgress in palliative care2018
Mobile health technology and home hospice care: promise and pitfalls.
Article in Progress in palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Hospice@Home for Home-Based Palliative Care: Development and Usability Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Family Caregivers' Perspectives on the Potential of Drone-Based Medication Delivery in Palliative Home Care: Qualitative Focus Group Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of a Remote Monitoring System for Palliative and End-of-Life Care (CARE-PAC): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- More than 3 years of teleconsultations: A retrospective cohort study in specialized outpatient palliative care.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potential Use of Wearable Devices as a Prognostic Tool among Patients in Hospice Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
- Usability and Acceptability of a Palliative Care Mobile Intervention for Older Adults With Heart Failure and Caregivers: Observational Study.JMIR aging · 2022Article
- Identification of Digital Health Priorities for Palliative Care Research: Modified Delphi Study.JMIR aging · 2022Article
- Aliviado Mobile App for Hospice Providers: A Usability Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022Article
- Palliative care providers' use of digital health and perspectives on technological innovation: a national study.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- Patients' experiences of eHealth in palliative care: an integrative review.BMC palliative care · 2020Review
- Building trust and facilitating goals of care conversations: A qualitative study in people with heart failure receiving home hospice care.Palliative medicine · 2020Article
- Leveraging Smart Health Technology to Empower Patients and Family Caregivers in Managing Cancer Pain: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing use of mobile devices (e.g., smart phones, tablets) in our everyday lives, people have the ability to communicate and share information faster than ever before. This has led to the development of promising applications aimed at improving health and healthcare delivery for those with limited access. Hospice care, which is commonly provided at home, may particularly benefit from the use of this technology platform. This commentary outlines several potential benefits and pitfalls of incorporating mobile health (mHealth) applications into existing home hospice care while highlighting some of the relevant telemedicine work being done in the palliative and End-of-Life care fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.